I can't watch the video on this computer but that sounds fair to me.
Is there a way you could read the transcript? There are several disillusioned volunteers who saw the amount of money coming in (one opened all the mail w/ checks, etc), but never understood where the money was going. (the dolar amount may be in the millions)
Simcox is on camera saying it went to this and that, but when the reporter went down there and interviewed the volunteers, Simcox had not been truthful (portapotties/food, etc).
Suffice it to say I'm not going to believe some ABC reporter without some pretty powerful evidence and allowing the MM to respond themselves.
Silly me I thought that's how things were supposed to work. Hey when some rich white kids get accused falsely of rape some of the same people are up in arms defending them and ripping the media to shreds.
But since its someone these folks don't like I guess old fashioned stuff like evidence and the presumption of innocence are just waaaaay to old fashioned.
Far better to start calling people criminals without any evidence. That seems like adult behavior to me. How about you?
L