What a bunch of absolute hogwash. You can take 3 eye witnesses and get 3 different stories a day after they witnessed something. Now, ask their decendants hundreds and then thousands of years later what happened and you wonder why the stories aren't 100% alike? ROFL
Oh--so after surviving this flood, the survivors simply forgot to write it down, and only later their descendents cobbled it together, which explains all the discrepancies...yet, you posted a chart "proving" the consistencies.
These folks simply sauntered away from the ark--having been the only survivors of the human race--and, well, they had lots of other things to worry about, so they didn't bother recording what happened, leaving that to others down the line to piece together from, uh, STORIES that came down from hundreds and then thousands of years--as you admit, in your own words.
So these stories--which could be about any flood, and don't include the very specific details in the Bible--somehow support the Bible story...but you yourself have admitted they're not consistent.
So the fact that the stories aren't consistent proves the Noah's Ark story is true; and the fact that the stories are NOT consistent ALSO proves the Noah's Ark story is true.
Talk about ROFL!