Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays at Globe told to marry or lose benefits
Boston Herald ^ | July 8, 2006 | Jesse Noyes

Posted on 07/07/2006 11:02:46 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

Memo to Boston Globe gay and lesbian Guild employees: Get married or lose your domestic partner benefits.

Globe staffers have been told that health and dental benefitsfor gay employees’ domestic partners are being discontinued. Gay couples who want to keep their benefits must marry by Jan. 1.

A memo sent to the Globe’s Boston Newspaper Guild members, and obtained by the Herald, states that Massachusetts gay Guild employees can extend their benefits to their partners only if they marry.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bostonglobe; gaymarriage; gays; globe; hmosexualagenda; homosexualagenda; samesexmarriage; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Howie Carr is going to have a blast with this.
1 posted on 07/07/2006 11:02:48 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

ROTFLMAO

Careful what you wish for!


2 posted on 07/07/2006 11:03:45 PM PDT by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Ping!


3 posted on 07/07/2006 11:05:44 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (That's taxes, not Texas. I have no beef with TX. NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Well, this is confusing; are they saying that the "partner benefits" that so many states and companies now extend to their employees isn't legit?


4 posted on 07/07/2006 11:06:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Great retort. So true.


5 posted on 07/07/2006 11:07:08 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes, unless they "sanctify their unions". No more Mr. Nice Guy.


6 posted on 07/07/2006 11:08:39 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

"But hold on a second! We wanted the benefits, but we never wanted to have to stay together! We love to hit the clubs every night! This is not fair!"


7 posted on 07/07/2006 11:09:38 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

Thanks for the ping.


8 posted on 07/07/2006 11:10:37 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

You know, I just got off the phone with a gay friend of mine. The guy was in tears are losing the love of his life. At the time, the both of them were cheating on each other with numerous partners. They went on again and off again, all the while cheating. Then finally the break up, the other guy fell head over heels for another guy, but then he cheated on him after a few weeks. So now there's hope(?).

So now my friend wants to get back with this guy and said that he'd have to be comfortable with the other guy receiving nude, full-body massages from other gay men beause "he could detatch himself." What?

It's not like this has never dawned on me before, but it was just too obvious how inherently screwed up gay relationships are in the first place. There is no end point, no destination. No white picket fence and 2.5 kids. It's just sex and companionship: not the sturdy stock of family-building. Just semi-commitment in a sea of promiscuity--and that's the norm--one I don't really see changing.


9 posted on 07/07/2006 11:10:46 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
So - first you are not allowed to get married - now you are ordered too?

/when the world decides to deal in craziness, things get crazier....like in insane

10 posted on 07/07/2006 11:12:17 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan; raccoonradio
Howie Carr is going to have a blast with this.

Got THAT right! ;-D

11 posted on 07/07/2006 11:13:45 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

Alittle too much detail for me.

But, in the end, exaclty how many gays have gotten married in Mass? Not too many. I think it's less than 10k. If their was alot wanting to get married they would have done it already.


12 posted on 07/07/2006 11:14:17 PM PDT by Marius3188 (Happy Resurrection Weekend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Well, could this have reprecussions in other states?


13 posted on 07/07/2006 11:14:24 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

I went to a relative's house for the Fourth of July. As I approached the driveway, I noticed a pickup with a Bush/Cheney bumper sticker and window decals that showed membership in righty political organizations. I asked my relative "Who's the dude with the pickup?" She (my relative) said "Oh, that is a neighbor down the street. SHE has a very liberal girlfriend." :-)


14 posted on 07/07/2006 11:16:03 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Maybe too much detail, but believe me, I was sparing details.

The sheer impossibility of that sort of relationship in a standard male-female partnership is what floored me. I knew this stuff happened, but to try to respond to it with sympathy was next to impossible. How was I going to do that when any girl who behaved this way with me would never again hear from me...ever!

One act of betrayal is enough to destroy most male-female couples. The lines are very clearly set and understood. Not so in gay relationships.


15 posted on 07/07/2006 11:17:52 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Careful what you wish for!

They were warned about this repeatedly. The media ignored the warnings. These aren't unexpected consequences, albeit unintended.

The gay activists are not acting in the interest of the gay community. The activists are pursuing an anti-Christian agenda, under the guise of gay rights.

But, as we see here, the thing a lot of homosexuals overlooked is the coupling of the privileges they sought, as if they were "rights", with responsibilities.

Which is why "marriage" or legal unions for homosexuals are not a blessing. Homosexual relationships are typically more turbulent, and less likely to last than heterosexual relationships. Given unions of any kind under the law, they must now deal with the responsibilities such unions entail - including care and costs for their partners after partnerships are dissolved.

16 posted on 07/07/2006 11:18:08 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

AHEM! AHEM! < /howiesoundfx >


17 posted on 07/07/2006 11:18:25 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I would imagine there is already a lot of fraudulent,, "partnerships" in order to cash in on the benefits - and this will only increase with the so-called marriages.

This will skyrocket health insurance costs for companies and - well, the whole medical field - and we will all see our insurances go up, as well as all other medical costs.

18 posted on 07/07/2006 11:18:42 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

States rights. So only to the extent that other states want to be influenced I would think.


19 posted on 07/07/2006 11:19:23 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

The David Scondras clearing of throat. LOL!


20 posted on 07/07/2006 11:20:20 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson