To: nhoward14
Actually, Clinton spent close to what President Bush has spent on Defense per GDP. They both are close to 3.5 overall I think.
Carter was spending close to double that. I'm surprised it's been so low while we are fighting WWIII. We all know that War spurs other advances in technology, Health, and other areas.
41 posted on
07/08/2006 11:20:12 AM PDT by
Marius3188
(Happy Resurrection Weekend)
To: Marius3188; nhoward14
Nhoward
My apologies, I was incorrect on Carter. He was closer to 4.5. Not the amount I said before.
43 posted on
07/08/2006 11:26:57 AM PDT by
Marius3188
(Happy Resurrection Weekend)
To: Marius3188
"Actually, Clinton spent close to what President Bush has spent on Defense per GDP."
I know Klinton initiated deep cuts in defence spending, and was averse to taking any real action against Al Quaeda, The Taliban or Afghanistan.
There is simply no way Klinton spent "close to what President Bush has spent" on Defense.
47 posted on
07/08/2006 11:45:53 AM PDT by
Jameison
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson