Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nhoward14

Actually, Clinton spent close to what President Bush has spent on Defense per GDP. They both are close to 3.5 overall I think.

Carter was spending close to double that. I'm surprised it's been so low while we are fighting WWIII. We all know that War spurs other advances in technology, Health, and other areas.


41 posted on 07/08/2006 11:20:12 AM PDT by Marius3188 (Happy Resurrection Weekend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Marius3188; nhoward14

Nhoward

My apologies, I was incorrect on Carter. He was closer to 4.5. Not the amount I said before.


43 posted on 07/08/2006 11:26:57 AM PDT by Marius3188 (Happy Resurrection Weekend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188
"Actually, Clinton spent close to what President Bush has spent on Defense per GDP."

I know Klinton initiated deep cuts in defence spending, and was averse to taking any real action against Al Quaeda, The Taliban or Afghanistan.
There is simply no way Klinton spent "close to what President Bush has spent" on Defense.
47 posted on 07/08/2006 11:45:53 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson