To: RadioAstronomer
I agree with the this ruling. If this practice was allowed to stand, who knows what would be next to be "scrubbed" from movies. Except that you would have the choice to buy a clean version or the original. This ruling states only the original is allowed. No one is getting cheated from profits.
This, because of its irreparable injury to the creative artistic expression, from the article is a load of hooey!
20 posted on
07/08/2006 9:45:36 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: DJ MacWoW
This, because of its irreparable injury to the creative artistic expression, from the article is a load of hooey! Indeed! Because the artists allow the exact same cuts when the movie is shown on network TV.
79 posted on
07/08/2006 10:44:32 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: DJ MacWoW
Looks like this will go up the line.....
377 posted on
07/09/2006 3:42:32 AM PDT by
GregB
(This family supports The U. S Marines!!!!!!)
To: DJ MacWoW
BS. The copyright holder has control of the work, it's that simple. If that wasn't the case, what would keep me from selling copies of Ann Coulter's books with different endings to the essays?
516 posted on
07/09/2006 2:21:07 PM PDT by
Melas
(Offending stupid people since 1963)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson