1 posted on
07/09/2006 11:33:42 AM PDT by
DBeers
To: DBeers
"This case is ripe for appeal," Cox said, but he suppressed saying "otherwise, I don't get paid."
2 posted on
07/09/2006 11:38:00 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Go home and fix Mexico)
To: DBeers
Somehow I don't think the court would have ruled this way if the perpetrator had been a Catholic priest instead of a public school teacher. Call me a cynic.
To: DBeers
The mother and son initially filed a federal suit against the school board and Goodwin in February 2004. The suit cited district officials for failing to protect the former student's civil rights and require appropriate assistance to those with disabilities, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Oh please! The homo rapist should get life behind bars, but the lotto lawsuit in Federal court is to much.
To: DBeers
Judge: $10M suit against school board too late (TN)
Slavery Reparations Gaining Momentum
I find the juxtaposition of these two threads in the sidebar curiously intriguing.
10 posted on
07/09/2006 12:18:43 PM PDT by
NicknamedBob
(I never submit to IQ tests. That way, I can honestly say that my IQ can not be measured.)
To: DBeers
an adult...so he is 18 which means he was 15 then and he got "raped"...ooooooooook
To: DBeers
Their problem was their lawyer had them file a federal case first. They should have filed both a federal and local case at the same time (February of 2004) then they would have met the deadlines.
Statute of Limitations are not "technicalities". They exist to make sure people who are REALLY harmed can sue without the rest of us worrying about getting sued for stuff that happened years ago.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson