[Jedi Master Pikachu]

You ought to lay off the insults, VadeRetro. Can you expalin exactly how macroevolution could occur without additional genetic material? Or do you only have more rudeness to toss around?

[Coyoteman]

Can you expalin exactly how macroevolution could occur without additional genetic material?

Easy--lots of microevolution, lots of time.

[VadeRetro]

You ought to lay off the insults, VadeRetro.

You should pay attention to the content of the "insults." You are attempting to bludgeon with your total complete sweeping incomprehension of what science has to say about evolution. This is very unconvincing. It would be better if you weren't totally unfamiliar with what you "know" is wrong.

Can you expalin exactly how macroevolution could occur without additional genetic material?

Evolution proceeds not only by addition, but by deletion. This is often an important step.

How Can Evolution Cause Irreducibly Complex Systems?

Or do you only have more rudeness to toss around?

I'm trying to get your attention to the exceedingly fallacious nature of your arguments. You have the utter basics utterly wrong.

[VadeRetro]

I have also once already on this thread cited another freeper's short compendium making it clear that increases in genetic information are a commonplace. The link I gave you in the preceding post addresses some of the same issues.

So, increases occur. Deletions occur. Mainstream science has known this for many decades now. Sites like AnswersInGenesis stick their fingers in their ears and shout "La! La! La! I can't hear you!"

You don't learn much about how the world works doing that.