To: steve-b
In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in plot.
3 posted on
07/10/2006 8:17:54 AM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: mtbopfuyn
I don't go to the movies for precisely this reason.
8 posted on
07/10/2006 8:19:40 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: mtbopfuyn
In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in are the plot.
40 posted on
07/10/2006 8:28:41 AM PDT by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: mtbopfuyn
In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in plot. A movie that wouldn't have any sound at all if it weren't for the fowl language.
46 posted on
07/10/2006 8:31:04 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Loose lips sink ships - and the New York Times really doesn't have a problem with sinking ships.)
To: mtbopfuyn
fowl language serves no purpose in plot.
In this movie it was really gratuitous!
47 posted on
07/10/2006 8:31:05 AM PDT by
Borges
To: mtbopfuyn
"In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in plot." It could be argued that "...in the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language" IS the plot, in as much as after making money for those who prostitute all decency to make them, the main objective is to mainstream their values (or lack thereof).
To: mtbopfuyn
Isn't that the truth. In fact, it's generally an interruption of a plot that would be more smooth without it.
My wife and I previewed Leap of Faith staring Steve Martin a number of years ago. In the previewed version there was a sex scene. After the viewing we were asked to give our views. I stood up and said the sex scene really added nothing to the movie and it would be better off without it. A number of other agreed. It was cut.
63 posted on
07/10/2006 8:38:42 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
To: mtbopfuyn
In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in plot. Once you cut out the sex, violence and language, most movies would only last 15 minutes.
142 posted on
07/10/2006 9:15:41 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
To: mtbopfuyn
>>
In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in plot.<<
You said it. Has anyone seen The Aviator?
At one point, every third word is "G-D-". And I mean, for a LONG time, and it is meant to make a point of some kind.
Somebody really had an axe to grind, it would seem.
157 posted on
07/10/2006 9:23:55 AM PDT by
SerpentDove
(BREAKING: Body of Ken Lay Indicted)
To: mtbopfuyn
In the vast majority of Hollyweird products, sex, violence, and fowl language serves no purpose in plot.In the vast majority of movies out today, the only redeaming features are the sex and violence!
In a related note, I just saw a movie that's absolutely terrific, although it's for adults, and deals with adult topics. "Must Love Dogs" was a terrific "couples" movie. OK, John Cusak has some stinky political views, but I've had a serious crush on Diane Lane since... Forever!
Plus, a costar is a Newfie!
Mark
250 posted on
07/10/2006 10:12:27 AM PDT by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson