Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: infoguy
Chait actually wrote that President Bush is a "greater threat" to the country than Osama bin Laden, and it is "quite reasonable to conclude that Bush will harm the nation more" than Bin Laden.

Y'know...that's just silly! At the outset, it robs Chait's argument of any credibility.

It is truly amazing that such ludicrous notions can be taken seriously. And, especially, by a supposedly adult publication -- like the Los Angeles Times.

Yet, millions of lefties believe this tripe. It is truly a statement about their mental capacities. And their sanity...

11 posted on 07/11/2006 6:26:48 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
It is truly amazing that such ludicrous notions can be taken seriously. And, especially, by a supposedly adult publication -- like the Los Angeles Times.

Actually, it's not that amazing. Have you checked the state of the public school system over the past 15/20 years? It is not surprising at all that adults take this seriously. They have no ability to think things through anymore. (And no, I'm not trying to hijack the thread to another topic.)

15 posted on 07/11/2006 6:36:57 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
It is truly amazing that such ludicrous notions can be taken seriously. And, especially, by a supposedly adult publication -- like the Los Angeles Times.

If you haven't picked up a copy of the LA Times recently, you're in for a shock. I thought the newspaper was horrible 10 years ago when I quit even looking at free copies.

Well, the other day I found a copy of the Orange County Edition on my desk and had a peek. The two facing editorial pages, well, let's just say it was like reading a print edition of Democratic Underground. They've gone over to the dark side completely. "Bush is a Liar," "Bush is a Scumbag," and "We should be nice to the terrorists" were the gist of three of the editorials that come to mind. There were others espousing socialism in one form or another.

I knew it was bad, but this was shocking. There was not one SINGLE paragraph that made any sense whatsoever. I suppose it should come as no surprise that newspapers of record are now printing national secrets on their front pages. It will be interesting to see how much lower they can go.

18 posted on 07/11/2006 6:48:15 PM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson