Especially to those who know a great deal about missile guidance, surface to air missiles, or anything related to military missile firing exercises. It has been the spontaneous center fuel tank explosion/3000 ft climb theory that the least credible to the vast majority of technically knowledgeable people.
Really? Then perhaps those "experts" could explain how the target tracking and missile guidance radars that employ very powerful and narrow beam radar energy using specific pulse and frequency codes to guide a missile to the only target they are tracking, could then guide that missile to another target operating miles away. And perhaps those "experts" could explain how the radar seeker located in the relatively fragile nose of a surface to air missile could survive not only the impact with a target drone, but survive plunging through that drone and arrive intact on the other side, never breaking contact with the radars guiding it to its target, and then maintain not only the energy but the ability to guide to a second target located miles away from its intended target which it then impacts with enough energy to penetrate and guide through without leaving a trace of its existence. And perhaps those "experts" could point to a single example of the US military conducting surface to air missile tests in an extremely crowded civilian air corridor. And while they're at it, perhaps they could point to the launch location of the supposed target drone.
But if they did describe such a scenario, they obviously wouldn't be "experts" in any of the topics described, because none of them could or would happen.
With regard to the cause you listed for the demise of TWA 800, you clearly have not read the NTSB report, (supported by both TWA and Boeing) that does not describe what you state is the most likely scenario for the end of TWA 800.
I've wasted plenty (too much) time on these threads trying to explain to people the difference between fact and fiction. Most of those people (maybe all) have never read the actual accident investigation report of this incident which is available to any an all at the following links....
NTSB TWA 800 Final Report
TWA 800 Investigation Docket Materials
...and that says all I need to know about their "expertise". Instead they prefer to get their information from conspiracy artists who make a living propagating phony theories for blood money through such "credible" sources as WorldNetDaily. I no longer have any delusions of steering someone like that toward anything resembling reality. Anyone who is really interested in the truth will have the intellectual integrity to read the NTSB information for themselves. Unfortunately, most of the people who subscribe to conspiracy theories have little real intellect or integrity and they prove it every time they refuse to read all the facts available about incidents like TWA 800. Rather than actually reading the NTSB report they simply deny it could be true. Yet, they don't even know what it really says (hint: the NTSB does not support the statement that TWA 800 climbed 3000' after its nose separated).
That is my final comment on this thread.