Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Korea: Legislator Chung, "N. Korea to make up to 17 Taepodong's"(more details)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 07/14/06

Posted on 07/14/2006 12:19:46 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

Legislator Chung, "N. Korea to make up to 17 Taepodong's"

Supreme Council Member Chung Hyung-geun
 
National Assemblyman Chung Hyung-geun, a member of Supreme Council of Hannara Party(note: S. Korea's conservative opposition) made a claim on July 14 regarding N. Korean missile launches. He said, "N. Korea intends to make up to 17 (Taepodong-2) missiles."

Supreme Councilman Chung added this remark, at the council meeting held in (Hannara) party headquarter at Yom-chang-dong(, Seoul,) while adding, "N. Korea has plenty of black budget."

He further explained, "N. Korea has No. 1 budget, which is for the Cabinet, and No. 2 budget, the military budget. For example, the revenues from blue crabs caught near Yonpyong Island(note: an W. Sea(Yellow Sea) Island very close to N. Korea) go to No. 2 budget. This budget finances the production of Taepodong-2 missiles. There is plenty of No.2 budget, but they ask our government to send half a million ton of rice. If we send them, the same amount of money will be further added to military budget(note: No.2 budget.)"

He went on to say, "N. Korea had launched one Taepodong-2 missile, and is preparing to launch another. N. Korea has 450 Nodong missiles, each of which costs 400,000 dollars, and 400 Scud missiles, costing 200,000 dollars each." 

At the meeting, Kang Je-sup, the party chief argued,  regarding N. Korean missile and nuclear crisis, "S. Korea-U.S., S. Korea-Japan, inter-Korean problems are all tangled up and turned into a mess. The idea of '(S. Korea as) N.E. Asia's Balancer' put forth by the current government is completely ludicrous, and, in another respect,  made us completely out of loop in N.E. Asian affairs. He demanded, "Special committees inside the party should assemble comprehensive list of foreign policy failures by Roh Moo-hyun regime,  systematically analyze them, and made recommendations (for our response.)"

Seoul = Yonhap News
 
/end my translation
 
Mr. Chung was a career intel-man until he went into politics. He still has extensive contacts in S. Korean intel community. His sources are reliable most of the time. He is currently No. 5 man in conservative opposition Hannara Party.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 17; chunghyunggeun; korea; missile; no1budget; no2budget; nodong; northkorea; scud; taepodong2
Mr. Chung was a career intel-man until he went into politics. He still has extensive contacts in S. Korean intel community. His sources are reliable most of the time. He is currently No. 5 man in conservative opposition Hannara Party.

1 posted on 07/14/2006 12:19:53 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/14/2006 12:20:37 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"N. Korea has plenty of black budget."

But they're making a big fuss about that $25 million locked up in Macau.

3 posted on 07/14/2006 12:25:18 AM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Re #3

I suspect it is the money flow they are concerned about. Without the money conduit, their plentiful black budget would dry up, IMO.

4 posted on 07/14/2006 12:32:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Mr. Ronery had best watch it, He may accidentally, while trying to produce his Tapeodong-2, screw up and make a steponhisdong-X
5 posted on 07/14/2006 12:33:44 AM PDT by Not now, Not ever! (This tag-line is temporarily closed for remodeling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If North Korea gets Japan angry enough, all of the Pacific Rim allies will poise to pounce on...

...China.

Meanwhile other allies will knock Iran's military down--same time.


6 posted on 07/14/2006 12:49:43 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Chung is likely right, but North Korea is too late.

17 Taepodongs are mere tagets for our more than 60 Aegis SM-2 and SM-3 anti-missiles, our air born laser, THEL, PAC-3, etc.

7 posted on 07/14/2006 12:51:39 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Re #6

It is increasingly likely that we have two-front war, or military action, whichever way you call it.

N. Korea and Iran is coordinating their action to stretch U.S. as thin as possible with the aim of wearing it down. China and Russia stand back and watch.

They force it to U.S., and U.S. have to respond.

8 posted on 07/14/2006 12:56:28 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Re #7

Chia Head is counting on Iran to do its diversion by using Hizbullah and Hamas. The fight against remaining members of 'Axis of Evil' is heading toward its climax.

9 posted on 07/14/2006 12:59:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I don't see it. Iran isn't going anywhere *near* Israel with U.S. troops and armor on Iran's Western (Iraq) and Eastern (Afghanistan) borders.

Iran and Syria will sit this one out. Notice that they haven't called up their reserves. They aren't mobilizing. Nor is Egypt. Nor is Jordan.

This leaves Israel with a free hand to smash Hezbollah and Hamas.

Which means that the U.S. isn't stretched thin.

North Korea is therefor too late. The game is over, they just don't know it yet.

10 posted on 07/14/2006 1:03:50 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Must mean they have, or plan very soon to have, 17 nukes to put on them; why would you put a firecracker on an icbm?


11 posted on 07/14/2006 1:07:55 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"It is increasingly likely that we have two-front war, or military action, whichever way you call it.

N. Korea and Iran is coordinating their action to stretch U.S. as thin as possible with the aim of wearing it down. China and Russia stand back and watch.

They force it to U.S., and U.S. have to respond."

If that is the case, neither Iran nor North Korea is thinking very clearly. Israel is well capable of taking care of anything in the Middle East, if we allow them to act without restraint.

Japan, our ally in the East, may not be as strong militarily as Israel, but they too have a great deal at stake, and I believe they would fight just as fiercely to protect their country from any North Korean threat.

12 posted on 07/14/2006 1:13:22 AM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
They force it to U.S., and U.S. have to respond.

They hope this is correct..

What they do not consider is that U.S. and any allies only have to do the destruction part, not the rebuilding and holding hands part...
We do it because Americans are "nice guys", and we try to pick up our former enemies and get them started on the correct path..

But we waste a lot of resources that way, and take a lot of time rebuilding and "reaching out"...

If we decide to do it short and sweet, i.e., just "kill people and break things", it will not take much time or man-power..
We have the technology... We can utterly destroy him..
And still have plenty left over for Iran...
And Russia, and China...

13 posted on 07/14/2006 1:13:51 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom... Not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Southack

I think you're both right. Some of the current desires and tactics of our enemies are obvious, yet they underestimated the strengths arrayed against them. They won't have the mobility that they're trying to play for, but they will make more glaring errors.


14 posted on 07/14/2006 1:23:21 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

They can coordinate, but the North Korean issue is more solvable by air and sea power and Iran/Iraq by land power, so the U.S. is not going to be in an intolerable strain. The worst that can happen is we take the Civilian Reserve Air Fleet, which will mean the airlines have some guaranteed revenue.


15 posted on 07/14/2006 2:47:58 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Not now, Not ever!

The new missiles that really scare me are the longdong and hungchow.


16 posted on 07/14/2006 4:16:17 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

So, is there any way that ROC can keep Seoul from being a 'hostage' in an ourbreak of hostilities? The threat to 24-36 million Koreans is simply unacceptable.

Perhaps it's time to deploy a few Ohio Class Tridents and take out DPRK command and control mechanisms.


17 posted on 07/14/2006 8:06:53 AM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
It is increasingly likely that we have two-front war, or military action, whichever way you call it.

Three fronts if one counts the distinct possiblity of a Chinese move on Taiwan when they percieve that US Forces are spread thin enough to prevent a response.

18 posted on 07/14/2006 8:09:47 AM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Re #17

I am not sure.

19 posted on 07/14/2006 9:01:45 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"Special committees inside the party should assemble comprehensive list of foreign policy failures by Roh Moo-hyun regime, systematically analyze them, and made recommendations (for our response.)"

Bet they already have such a list made up. LOL! Can Roh last til the end of his term, the way things are going for him?

20 posted on 07/14/2006 9:15:27 AM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson