Posted on 07/15/2006 4:39:34 PM PDT by Pokey78
TO THE lay observer it seems like an infinite network of computers, servers and cables stretching around the globe. But the worldwide web is filling up. So quickly, it turns out, that programmers have had to devise a new one.
Of the internet addresses available, more than three quarters are already in use, and the remainder are expected to be assigned by 2009. So, what will happen as more people in developing countries come online? The answer is IPv6, a new internet protocol that has more spaces than the old one: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000 spaces, in fact. “Currently there’s four billion addresses available and there are six billion humans on Earth, so there’s obviously an issue there,” said David Kessens, chairman of the IPv6 working group at RIPE, one of five regional internet registries in charge of rolling it out.
Every device that is connected to the internet — websites, computers and mobile phones — needs an “internet address” to locate it on the network.
When the internet was developed in the 1980s, programmers had no idea how big it would become. They gave each address a “16-bit” number, which meant that the total number of available addresses worked out at about four billion (2 to the power of 32).
But as use grew, it became clear that the old protocol, IPv4, wasn’t big enough, so a new one was written based on “32-bit numbers”. That increased the number of available addresses to 340 undecillion, 282 decillion, 366 nonillion, 920 octillion, 938 septillion — enough for the foreseeable future, Mr Kessens said.
IPv6 does not involve any new cables being laid, nor will there be any burden on customers, for whom the change will appear seamless. It will, however, greatly improve the quality of certain internet services, in particular phone calls, which are not suited to IPv4.
“The big change is going to be in peer-to-peer services like gaming and file-sharing, which are going to become much easier to use,” Mr Kessens said.
Several service providers, including AOL and Yahoo!, have applied for space on the new network, and IPv6 is in use in some countries, including the Netherlands. But the big “driver” is likely to be the release next year of the new version of Microsoft Windows, Vista, which is understood to contain some IPv6-only applications. The US Government has told departments to make their systems “IPv6-ready” by 2008.
The Department of Trade and Industry said it was aware of the changeover, but that it was up to large providers to take the lead when it occurred.
Both protocols can work on the same network and IPv4 will not be decommissioned.
ONLINE, ON THE PHONE, ON THE UP
50 billion the number of e-mails dispatched every day wordwide; in 2001 the traffic was less than 12 billion
88 per cent of e-mails are junk including about 1 per cent which are virus-infected
32 The average number of e-mail messages received per person per day. This is rising by 84 per cent each year
440 million the number of electronic mailboxes in use, including 170 million corporate ones, growing by 32 per cent per year
1,035 million the total number of mobile phone text messages sent each month in Britain
37 The average number of texts a user sends per month compared with 21 in 2001 1 million the number of children aged under 10 in Britain — one in three — who own a phone
8 The average age at which a child gets a mobile phone in Britain
www.340,282,366,920,938,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.UNNNGH
:O)
I would have thought that the need for IP6 would have diminished because of widespread NAT'd private subnets. I would not want my phone or refrigerator to be directly on the public internet.
Finally, a number Carl Sagan would enjoy.
Meanwhile, the US government is thinking ... if we put a 1 cent tax on every IPv6 address... we could afford to buy 12 more hammers a year!
One of the design features of IP is that the address can be used for routing. I've heard talk of mobile machines being given 'permanent' addresses, but that would seem to require a huge architecture to keep track of where all the machines were. Better, I would think, would be to simply require mobile machines to connect to a "home base", which would then keep them informed if anyone wanted to talk to them.
At least an octillion of those will be porn sites.
The 4 billion address number in IPv4 includes the private network addressing spaces. The other problem is that IPv4 IPs are not sold individually. They have to be assigned in blocks which adds to the speed at which they are used up.
I heard that Carl enjoyed numbers.
I suspect it is an issue of distribution, as they are running out of class A and B addresses to dole out to controlling entities. (A.B.C.D) Not an issue of one computer per human as described.
Well, that ought to take care of our galaxy...
"Well, that ought to take care of our galaxy..."
And I'm STILL waiting for my flying car! ;)
Unless Mr. Kessens is a technically incompetent dork, I am quite certain he said no such thing.
16-bit numbers range from 0 to 65535 if they're "unsigned," and from -32768 to 32767 if they're "signed." Unsigned 32-bit numbers range from 0 to 4,294,967,295. The number of IP addresses supported by IPv6 (340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456,) requires 128 bits (16 bytes)--a value which can be computed as 2 to the power of 128.
Don't worry, this is just preparation for the One World Order. When we are all one, you'll be happy that Big Brother is monitoring your 'fridge so you don't get fat.
/sarc...or?
Reading that number gave me a headache. LOL!
Exactly. Even if you want a means of talking to your phone or television from elsewhere, I would see nothing wrong with simply opening an encrypted channel to your router that says, "I'd like to talk to the refrigerator via this channel."
And 49 billion of them are Viagra ads.
The 32 bits is the individual fields in the address.
IPv4 is 16bit.16bit.16bit.16bit for 64 bit addresses.
IPv6 is 32bit.32bit.32bit.32bit for 128 bit addresses.
Betcha someone has bought up billions of 'em.
That's almost certainly what the reporter meant, but it's quite certainly not at all what he actually said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.