No I don't and I'm sure you don't, but I do think it's reasoned to admit that some heterosexuals do spread some pretty rank diseases, up to and including AIDS. Is it to the degree that homosexuals do? No, there just isn't as much trauma involved in the acts in most instances.
I've never recommended quaranteening people, but I have had a very sympathetic view if it involved promiscuous people who were hell bent on infecting others, especially if that person hadn't a clue.
If monogomous homosexuals want to continue to have relations when both parties know what the risks are, I'm less inclined to quaranteen them.
I too think this disease would have basicly destroyed it's hosts and therefore itself if proper public health policies had been put in place and adhered to.
It's really a shame that they weren't.
Thanks for the comments.
You're quite welcome and I thank you for yours.
You take care now. Things are getting pretty squirrelly of late.