Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plastic planes 'set to rule sky'
BBC ^ | : Sunday, 16 July 2006, 19:25 GMT 20:25 UK | Staff

Posted on 07/16/2006 8:03:59 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: investigateworld
always thought the aircraft industry missed the bet by not going with cast iron...

Spoken like a true Soviet aircraft designer.

61 posted on 07/17/2006 5:37:42 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (( Vote Fraud: The Democrats' Secret Weapon .... Well, secret to the RNC, anyway.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid
The fuselage is laid up on a rotating mandrel and then cured in a huge oven (AUTOCLAVE) and emerging in ONE PIECE. This saves about a gazillion parts (and associated rivets) and therefore LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS of LABOR.

Till the giant part gets dinged by a food truck, then what? They can't just replace a panel or a bracket or whatever.

62 posted on 07/17/2006 5:39:48 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
Till the giant part gets dinged by a food truck...

It's my understanding their fiber supplier puts some sort of outer coating on the fibers that keep them from unraveling when dinged.

63 posted on 07/17/2006 5:50:18 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Ahead of the Farnborough Air Show, the US plane giant boss said "all future planes will be made out of composites", because it does not corrode.

Yes, but they do, delmaninate, crack and fail... And often do so catastrophically and without warning... such as that Airbus Composite Tail that snapped off in NY, killing all aboard.

64 posted on 07/17/2006 5:57:01 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Concrete, man. Cast, reinforced, prestressed concrete.
Held together with bolts anchored with epoxy, rught?

Of course, and assembled in Boston.

65 posted on 07/17/2006 5:59:24 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Titanium needs preciously little maintenance, does not corrode and is impervious to sunlight/UV caused degradation

Just don't get cadmium near it.

66 posted on 07/17/2006 6:09:32 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid; Paleo Conservative

More composites info:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003049536_dreamliner09.html


67 posted on 07/17/2006 7:06:04 AM PDT by phantomworker (So what, now what. ..... are you 'in choice'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Where are the granite-and-slate based planes I saw in the Flintstones?


68 posted on 07/17/2006 7:07:57 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
The airplane of the future will be made of concrete.

Plutonium.

If it crashes, don't sweat the Black Box. It's vaporized, man.

69 posted on 07/17/2006 7:09:10 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

They went away when the over-sized pterodactyls that carried them went extinct.


70 posted on 07/17/2006 7:14:40 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Unfortunately, up till now titanium metal has been very expensive to refine--something like 6-7 times the cost of refining aluminum metal. However, recent developments in titanium refining technology could drastically cut the cost of titanium refining, which could make it possible for airliners to use far more titanium structural parts. The switch to titanium structural parts could cut the weight of an airliner as much as 18%, since you don't need as much titanium alloy for the ssame structural strength as you need with aluminum alloy.


71 posted on 07/17/2006 7:15:38 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

"Plastic" is a really poor way to describe the state of the art in material science today.


72 posted on 07/17/2006 7:16:34 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I dated a plutonium blonde once. It didn't go well.


73 posted on 07/17/2006 7:24:05 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

ping


74 posted on 07/17/2006 7:27:06 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
I dated a plutonium blonde once.

Yeah, but I bet it was some utterly explosive he....

.....never mind.

75 posted on 07/17/2006 7:29:31 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

"Mulally should be talking to Burt Rutan."

They are probably running scared of Rutan.

Rutan has designed and built a commuter aircraft with a composite fuselage and high efficiency for carrying about 15-20 passengers. His idea is to enable the concept of small regional airports that run regular taxi routes which will be inexpensive and way more convenient than going to a large airport.

For trips of just a couple of hundred miles it makes alot of sense if they can get the price point down for each passenger. If the industry goes that way, toward smaller aircraft as air taxis, then the big companies like Delta and Northwestern will get a lot of competition for certain routes.


76 posted on 07/17/2006 7:40:59 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld; Paleo Conservative

Ever hear of the "Grumman Iron Works"?


77 posted on 07/17/2006 7:56:29 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberals-beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

I was speaking of the "workers" not the parts!


78 posted on 07/17/2006 10:12:06 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

I am sure the workers have a certain stake in the success of the Company as well or it would be another Airbust.


79 posted on 07/17/2006 10:50:26 AM PDT by phantomworker (So what, now what. ..... are you 'in choice'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Concrete, man. Cast, reinforced, prestressed concrete.

Wood and rocks.
More eco-friendly.

80 posted on 07/17/2006 11:32:45 AM PDT by uglybiker (Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson