Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Restorer
Apparently, after many centuries living in indefensible pueblos on the mesa tops,

A pueblo on a mesa top is indefensible only to air attacks. Being on top of a mesa was a means of defense.
60 posted on 07/18/2006 9:04:00 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan
Being on top of a mesa was a means of defense.

A small mesa, sure. As at Acoma.

I'm speaking of the large mesas such as at Mesa Verde, which are really more like a plain or plateau cut by canyons. Once the enemy was on the mesa, which was much too large to control access to, the pueblos were definitely not defensible without changing their entire character. Rather than build castles, the Anasazi logically moved into the cliff dwellings.

71 posted on 07/18/2006 9:20:43 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson