Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/19/2006 2:51:50 PM PDT by theworkersarefew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: theworkersarefew

PENCE TO PRESIDENT BUSH: VETO EMBRYONIC STEM CELL BILL



Rep. Pence with President Bush during June 28 meeting in the Oval Office

Related Documents

7-19-2006


Washington, Jul 19 -

WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Congressman Mike Pence today made the following statement on the House floor concerning legislation that would allow federal funding for embryonic stem cell research:

"President Ronald Reagan famously said, 'we cannot diminish the value of one category of human life-the unborn-without diminishing the value of all human life.'

"Yesterday the United States Senate passed a bill that authorizes the use of federal tax dollars to fund the destruction of human embryos for scientific research.

"And while supporters of the bill argue that this debate is a battle between science and ideology, that really misses the point.

"If the Castle-DeGette bill returns to the Congress tonight, we will simply decide whether Congress should take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use them to fund the destruction of human embryos for research.

"You see, I believe that life begins at conception and that a human embryo is human life. I believe it is morally wrong to create human life to destroy it for research. And I believe it is morally wrong to take the tax dollars of millions of pro-life Americans, who believe that life is sacred, and use it to fund the destruction of human embryos for research.

"This debate then tonight is not really about what an embryo is. This debate is about who we are as a nation and whether we respect fully half of our country.

"On behalf of those millions of pro-life Americans, Mr. President, veto this bill."

www.mikepence.house.gov


2 posted on 07/19/2006 2:52:24 PM PDT by theworkersarefew (pence08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theworkersarefew

Until he changes his mind.


3 posted on 07/19/2006 2:52:25 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theworkersarefew
Taxpayers who morally disagree with the destruction of human embryos shouldn't have their taxes used for federally funded research.

Can we exapand on that? There's a boatlaod of crap that comes out of Washington that I find morally reprehensible, and I'd like not to have to pay for it.

5 posted on 07/19/2006 2:55:25 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theworkersarefew
Taxpayers who morally disagree with the destruction of human embryos shouldn't have their taxes used for federally funded research...

That was Joan Baez's rationale for withholding her taxes; she didn't think people who disagreed with the war against Vietnam should have their taxes used for such. Perhaps there's a general principle here.

13 posted on 07/19/2006 3:07:08 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: theworkersarefew

Abortion advocates need fetal stem-cell research to create moral ambiguity surrounding abortion, which is really nothing short of mass murder. If it could be said that, "only fetal stem cells can cure the world of [insert your favorite dread disease]," then these murderers could feel a tiny shred of justification.

As it is -- and no matter what the utility of fetal stem cells -- abortion advocates deserve hell, forever.


17 posted on 07/19/2006 4:34:34 PM PDT by Tax Government (Defeat the evil miscreant donkeys and their rhino lackeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson