Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Terrorists Get Their Missiles
Strategypage ^ | July 19, 2006 | Harold C. Hutchison

Posted on 07/20/2006 6:45:18 AM PDT by budanski

The Chinese-designed C-802 missile that damaged an Israeli Saar 5-class corvette recently has implications beyond the present conflict in Lebanon. It shows that the threat of a transfer of weapons technology, from a state sponsor of terrorism like Iran, to a terrorist group, is very real.

Transferring an anti-ship missile like the C-802 is very difficult. Anti-ship missiles are big (the C-802 weighs 1500 pounds and is 21 feet long), and the launch vehicles are going to be about as big as a tractor-trailer rig. This is a system that is conspicuous, and hard to hide. The other thing to consider is that other stuff could be transferred as well. China has provided Iran at least 75 of these missiles, which have been installed on a variety of Iranian vessels (including newly-acquired missile boats from China, as well as older Sa'am-class frigates and Kaman-class patrol craft). China, of course, has received missile technology transfers from Israel (albeit this technology was for the Patriot surface-to-air missile, and had nothing to do with Chinese anti-ship missiles – an Israeli sale of its Phalcon AEW system was aborted). Israel also turned over data from the Lavi project, which later was used in the J-10 program.

Iran's transfer of C-802 missiles (along with the training to use them) is not the only such threat that has been worried about. One of the reasons that the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq was the possibility of the transference of chemical or biological weapons. The amount of these weapons needed to cause mass casualties are small – and artillery shells full of sarin nerve gas or mustard gas are much smaller than a C-802. Vials of anthrax, ricin, or smallpox are even smaller. The thought of weapons of mass destruction possibly getting into the hands of terrorists who are willing to die to complete their mission warranted removal of Saddam Hussein's regime, which had not shown the ability to transfer weaponry to terrorists (although Saddam Hussein was willing to cut $25,000 checks to the families of murder-suicide bombers).

Iran, though, now has been known to provide Hezbollah with anti-ship missiles. In a very real sense, the Iranian transfer of at least two such missiles has highlighted the threat posed by state sponsors of terrorism. If something like an anti-ship missile can be transferred, with all the inherent transportation difficulties moving one entails, what else has Iran given Hezbollah? And what else would Iran be willing to transfer if they were to have the opportunity? These are questions that will make world leaders very nervous.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armstrade; globaljihad; proliferation; terrorfunding
With Israel trading away a few of U.S. trade secrets to China, I'm not surprised to hear that somewhere down the road, an IAF pilot being shot down by a Chinese copy of the Patriot missile.
1 posted on 07/20/2006 6:45:19 AM PDT by budanski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: budanski

That is stupid. What rationale would Israel have for aiding China in any weaponry?


2 posted on 07/20/2006 6:52:34 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Money works. About the only profitable industry Israel has is its defense industry. China will do anything to acquire newest generation weapons tech, even sleep in the Lincoln bedroom. Put the two together and the idea of Israel selling tech to China is not far fetched. Israel did sell to Khomeini as a proxy for the Reagan Admin's Iran Contra policies, so why not China.?


3 posted on 07/20/2006 7:02:15 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

My understanding was that the weapons to Khomeni were garbage.

I just can't understand why the income would offset the knowledge that selling weapons to China is about the same as selling them to Iran/Syria/Hezbollah.


4 posted on 07/20/2006 7:13:06 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

$$$$$$$$$$$$$


5 posted on 07/20/2006 7:14:25 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
About the only profitable industry Israel has is its defense industry.

Israel has a strong economy with a lot of high tech industry.

Despite the facing a constant risk of terrorist attacks or invasion by their neighbors their GDP grew by 4% a year in 2003 and 2004, and grew 4.7% in 2005.

Despite the conflict their economy is growing faster than ours.

This is also in spite of many groups efforts to encourage divestment from Israel.

I do believe that they were having more economic troubles, or at least less growth, when they stupidly did those sales of weapons technologies but their defense industry is not even close to being their only profitable industry.

6 posted on 07/20/2006 7:28:45 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson