Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus
The "right to privacy" is abstract and difficult to define--which is why it wasn't included in the BoR. The notion that local govenment doesn't have the power to enforce local standards of decency as agreed upon by the majority of citizens is a liberal-tarian notion which had its coming-out party in the 1960s. I reject it completely. For those of you who accept it, I reckon your "enlightened" notions of privacy will be extinct the second the skunk-lover moves in next door.

The analogy is PERFECT! And the analysis that follows from it is exactly right. I would venture, though, that somewhat less than half of FReepers agree. Real conservatives (i.e., those who would preserve our social fabric) are a distinct minority, even here.

60 posted on 07/20/2006 2:01:25 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: madprof98

Real conservatives (i.e., those who would preserve our social fabric) are a distinct minority, even here.



The social fabric is subject to change. Those who seek to preserve what may no longer be practical are doomed to failure.


61 posted on 07/20/2006 2:03:15 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson