Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack2006
Blair would not let the Trident issue go to a vote if he wasn't sure of a victory.

Is it possible that he's letting it go to a vote because not so doing would necessitate his calling in the moving vans?

5 posted on 07/20/2006 3:31:03 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

No, it's because when you are sure of victory in a democratic vote, why put it through yourself?


8 posted on 07/20/2006 3:33:30 PM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

"Is it possible that he's letting it go to a vote because not so doing would necessitate his calling in the moving vans?"

If he's got enough votes to win (which he does), then there wouldn't be nearly enough support for any challenge to him as a result of not holding a vote.

He's only got a year and a bit left anyway, at best guess. The ongoing police investigations into donations to the Labour Party are more likely to make it shorter than anything else.


14 posted on 07/20/2006 3:40:56 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson