1 posted on
07/21/2006 6:03:10 AM PDT by
jmc1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: jmc1969
To: jmc1969
He said insurgents were streaming into the capital for "an all-out assault against the Baghdad area."
Seems like a pretty risky move.
3 posted on
07/21/2006 6:05:25 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: jmc1969
If they know insurgents are streaming in, can't they be stopped before the all-out attack?
4 posted on
07/21/2006 6:06:37 AM PDT by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: jmc1969
More insurgents "streaming" into Baghdad? Well, OK then. Let's kill'em quickly!
God bless our troops.
5 posted on
07/21/2006 6:07:18 AM PDT by
RexBeach
("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
To: jmc1969
So we have new insurgents from Iran streaming into Baghdad.
Where they will be sent to allah in a card board box.
6 posted on
07/21/2006 6:08:30 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: jmc1969
7 posted on
07/21/2006 6:08:35 AM PDT by
IrishMike
(Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
To: jmc1969
8 posted on
07/21/2006 6:10:05 AM PDT by
Van Jenerette
(U.S. Army 1967-1991, U.S.Army Infantry OCS Hall of Fame, Ft. Benning)
To: jmc1969
Hey maybe Iran is trying to distract the world from the mess they started with Israel which they started to distract the world from their nuclear program. Pop the corn.
9 posted on
07/21/2006 6:10:13 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: jmc1969
Insurgents everywhere are in "panic mode". They are losing.
To: jmc1969
So why is the US not bombing Iran and Syria who are behind these attacks?
Perhaps Bush thinks that if "Hezbullah would stp doing this s*it" there wouldn't be a problem?
My my, I just hope he insn't this naive.
14 posted on
07/21/2006 6:11:47 AM PDT by
observer5
("Better violate the rights of a few sometimes, than of all always!!)
To: jmc1969
The media wants this to be the Tet Offensive redeux so bad that they can taste it.
Not this time. They won't be able to cover up this American victory.
Why is it always 1968 for these people?
To: jmc1969
Stream away!
16 posted on
07/21/2006 6:13:20 AM PDT by
debg
To: jmc1969
Sounds like they want to do a "Tet" - which was, of course, a huge military defeat for the NVA, but the socialists in America made it into a political victory FOR THE ENEMY
18 posted on
07/21/2006 6:15:13 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: jmc1969
"Bombings and shootings soared by 40 percent in the Baghdad area in the past week, the U.S. command said Thursday."
Up 40% from last week?
That is significant?
What is down by, from last year or year to date or last month and what is the trend?
Violence always fluctuates from week to week. Could very well be that last week was low.
Normal Associalistic Press spin and BS.
19 posted on
07/21/2006 6:16:55 AM PDT by
Jameison
To: jmc1969
We can't use the MOAB until they concentrate their forces...
28 posted on
07/21/2006 6:37:45 AM PDT by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up two (2) seats in the Senate and four (4) seats in the House in 2006)
To: jmc1969
This should be entertaining. You know, the most powerful military in the world is all over the place over there. In addition, a newly formed local force of 236,000 men is spread throughout the country. 6.4 million people with cell phone subscriptions (and eyes) make 4785 actionable tips to the military
every month.
268 newspapers and magazines, 50 television stations, and numerous commercial radio stations let all the people know (in their own dialects) just who the scum bags really are.
Read more at this link if you'd like to catch up on what Iraq is really like circa May 2006.
29 posted on
07/21/2006 6:38:30 AM PDT by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: jmc1969
A roach motel within a roach motel.
I said this "war" was over at Fallujah, just like WW II in the Pacific was essentially over at Midway: this is about to be the "insurgents'" version of the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot.
30 posted on
07/21/2006 6:43:11 AM PDT by
LS
To: jmc1969
"Clearly the death squad elements, the terrorist elements, know that Baghdad is a must-win for them," he said. "Whoever wins the Baghdad area, whoever is able to bring peace and security to that area, is going to set the conditions to stabilize this country." Wapo's contribution to this story is evident by how they put these quotes together.
33 posted on
07/21/2006 8:02:54 AM PDT by
rennatdm
To: jmc1969
Every one of these vermin caught should be hauled into the street, doused with gasoline, and set on fire.
34 posted on
07/21/2006 8:39:47 AM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Liberalism's main product is Destruction and Death.)
To: jmc1969
The terrorists will lose their Tet Offensive and sustain horrendous losses.
But the anti-war Left will tout it as a hugh win for the terrorists, and demand the Failed Bush War means we must redeploy out NOW!
Too bad for them Walter Cronkite no longer rules the airwaves.
37 posted on
07/21/2006 10:11:11 AM PDT by
Gritty
(The mainstream media think of this war on terror as Bush's war, not America's war - Richard Miniter)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson