Skip to comments.
Philadelphia may evict Boy Scouts council [unless it changes its policy on gays......]
Press of Atlantic City ^
Posted on 07/22/2006 2:27:11 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: Sub-Driver; scripter
Can someone clarify this for me please...
Do the Girl Scouts (or whatever they are called) allow male Leaders?... and if not, what is the reason?
If the answer is that they don't allow male leaders, and for the reasons I am thinking, does Philadelphia have the same attitude towards them?
41
posted on
07/23/2006 1:38:41 PM PDT
by
mikeyc
To: mikeyc
Do the Girl Scouts (or whatever they are called) allow male Leaders?... and if not, what is the reason? We see that question every so often, and it's a good question indeed. I'm not sure the question has ever been answered without imposing a double standard.
42
posted on
07/23/2006 1:44:52 PM PDT
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: wintertime
Is this article just about California? I live in New England - but was, indeed, in California went the incident took place...in the 70's (The perp was also in LAW ENFORCEMENT! I went to the Sheriff also - got short shrift. I warned him that one day, his dept was going to be very embarrassed - and indeed they were, -
43
posted on
07/23/2006 2:37:24 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
To: maine-iac7
Sorry maine-iac, I had the wrong cut and paste on that post.
44
posted on
07/23/2006 3:38:57 PM PDT
by
wintertime
(Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
To: scripter; mikeyc
Yes, the GSUSA does allow male leaders, but I believe they cannot be "principal leader" (i.e., can't be the top unit leader, such as the Cubmaster or Scoutmaster in the BSA).
45
posted on
07/23/2006 6:43:28 PM PDT
by
RonF
To: RonF
**Yes, the GSUSA does allow male leaders, but I believe they cannot be "principal leader" (i.e., can't be the top unit leader, such as the Cubmaster or Scoutmaster in the BSA).**
In which case, it seems only logical that the same rule should apply to homosexuals in charge of boys, for the same reason.
I assume that Philadelphia doesn't prejudice against them... but then, it's the homosexuals who require preferential treatment, above the needs of the children... as usual.
46
posted on
07/24/2006 2:00:19 AM PDT
by
mikeyc
To: Sub-Driver
I think a whole stream of Christians should apply for leadership positions in gay organizations and we'll see how equally open they are to leadership that is opposed to their organization's core values.
47
posted on
07/24/2006 2:03:33 AM PDT
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: mikeyc
"In which case, it seems only logical that the same rule should apply to homosexuals in charge of boys, for the same reason."
And what reason would that be?
48
posted on
07/24/2006 6:59:06 AM PDT
by
RonF
To: Sub-Driver
The REST of the AGENDA:
While most homosexual activist groups publicly denounce NAMBLA and its agenda, the pedophile group is still allowed to march in "gay" pride parades in New York, San Francisco and Boston under its own NAMBLA banner.
Furthermore, some suggest that public disavowal of NAMBLA by homosexual groups is a smokescreen. David Thorstad, a founding member of NAMBLA and former president of New Yorks Gay Activists Alliance, says homosexual activists have supressed pedophilia in order "to sanitize the image of homosexuality to facilitate its entrance into the social mainstream."
To: little jeremiah
Philadelphia doesn't like "morally straight". The corrupt left favors that which favors it. Birds of a feather flock together...
50
posted on
07/24/2006 11:24:51 AM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: Frumious Bandersnatch
Just to play Devil's advocate:
In a legal sense, sometimes "in perpetuity" can mean indefinitely (i.e. no fixed term of years) and not necessarily forever and ever.
Traditionally, most property courts are loathe to enforce restrictions that permanently tie up property. You know, control of the dead hand and all.
51
posted on
07/24/2006 1:37:34 PM PDT
by
Balke
To: Neoliberalnot
There are a few things I remembered from my BSA days. For three years (1979 to 1981) I went to the Scout Camp at Ransburg off of IN446 by Lake Monroe. What I remembered, the people who were considered the adults including Senior Patrol leader who was around 17 years old, they used separate facilities when they went to shower. The toilets were a different matter since it was a long walk from different parts of the camp. I don't know how much has changed but if the BSA was smart, there would be at least two adults together when dealing with kids - accountability. I usher at my local Church and one rule is when we deal with kids, there are always two adults together especially when we take the 3 & 4 years to the bathroom. In fact, we do NOT enter either unless there is a fight (if any). There are two set of bathrooms and one set are off limits to the adults (kids only). The age cutoff is around 16 or 17.
Recently, I was visiting a local high school for some community things and it was during the school day. I had to use the can but I asked where the "Faculty" restrooms were at and used those even though it was at another part of the building.
The Boy Scouts has been a faggot magnet for decades. Similar incident occurred in CA back in the 60s in the Palo Alto area. Now we have NAMBLA to further the cause of molestation of boys by queers. Sickening, but this is an alternative lifestyle supported by the deviant-mongers and deviant judges.
To: Balke
Oh granted. However, I'll bet that the original town fathers had a different idea than the current setup.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson