Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

I wouldn't be surprised if the rate of only child families are higher than ever.

When you do genealogical research, it's chilling to compare the sizes of families back 100+ years ago to now.

"Large" families back then meant more than 14 kids.

And you're right, these singles are hopelessly spoiled.


70 posted on 07/22/2006 8:11:52 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason

People had a lot of kids back then because they tended to "add value" to the family enterprise -- whether piece work or farming. Plus, kids tended to do off at a pretty regular rate.

Today, kids don't add very much value and parents tend to have as many as they can afford, which means insure they receive adequate survival skills/tools in the form of an education.


74 posted on 07/22/2006 8:16:03 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson