To: King of Florida
There's a lot of assuming using "facts not in evidence" here. I don't know enough to say 100% who's at fault in this case. Some at FR are apparently clairvoyant.
36 posted on
07/24/2006 6:53:28 AM PDT by
Warren_Piece
(Smart is easy. Good is hard.)
To: Warren_Piece
There's a lot of assuming using "facts not in evidence" here. I don't know enough to say 100% who's at fault in this case. Some at FR are apparently clairvoyant.I obviously don't have all of the facts either, but usually -- though not always -- there is some fault on both sides.
43 posted on
07/24/2006 7:04:29 AM PDT by
King of Florida
(A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
To: Warren_Piece
Some at FR are apparently clairvoyant. Well I don't know what's wrong with you but it is all quite perfectly clear in my head.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson