Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't know where to start with this. Maybe we should begin with the US Commerce Department television converter clause in the Constitution.
1 posted on 07/25/2006 11:12:57 AM PDT by VRWCtaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VRWCtaz

To heck with the converter coupons, where is my HDTV coupon? I want it NOW.


2 posted on 07/25/2006 11:14:47 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

I bought one for camping, a portable tv and was given no warning this was going to happen - where is my coupon?


3 posted on 07/25/2006 11:16:34 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

Shear Foolishness!


6 posted on 07/25/2006 11:20:09 AM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz
If the entire $1.5 billion was used, the government could offer coupons for 37.5 million television sets. The law, approved last year, permits eligible homes to receive up to two coupons, each worth $40.

Are the idiots in congress seriously suggesting that the federal government needs to subsidize the costs of converter boxes for TWO televisions per household doesn't have cable or satellite television subscriptions?

I can go out and buy a new, low end DVD player for $40.

A tuner box for HD TV is not going to be a big expense, at least not after a few months go by and the market drives down the price.

However, it the government offers $40 coupons, the converters will definitely cost at least $40 if not $50-$60 since the government will have artificially raised the price consumers are willing to pay.

This is a huge government handout to consumer electronics companies, and since the US is not a major player in that market, it's mainly a gift to foreign companies.

This is really, really stupid.

10 posted on 07/25/2006 11:29:55 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

I think Congress budgeted something like $8B for converters but cannot find the stones to pony up $1B for border fencing.


12 posted on 07/25/2006 11:31:48 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead (Doing the jobs Americans won't do? Guess you haven't seen "Dirty Jobs")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

TV networks are poor and need help so Congress passed this subsidy for them. It has nothing to do with bribes/campaign contributions given to congressmen.

/sarc


14 posted on 07/25/2006 11:39:25 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

OK, tell me the date I need to drop my subscription to cable TV in order to get my two $40 coupons. I'm sure these will have cash value like WIC coupons do. I will sell them.

I'll wait about 45 days and then my cable co. will lure me back with a lower rate for the next year. It's nice to be a leach.


21 posted on 07/25/2006 11:56:56 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

They ought to be free to everyone that could care less about HDTV.


23 posted on 07/25/2006 11:57:15 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz
I need a new refrigerator coupon.

Cordially,

24 posted on 07/25/2006 12:07:12 PM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz
Consumers have been reluctant to buy the new sets because many still cost more than $1,000.

Duh. When they made the stoopid rule they should have passed a law requiring all new digital sets to cost $200. That is the way economics works, isn't it? In D.C that is...

26 posted on 07/25/2006 12:32:51 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz

So what's so wrong about providing these converters for off-the-air television viewers? The gov't has decided to sell off the freqs currently used for analog television transmissions, rendering all the pre-digital sets (and VCRs, etc) out there useless. Should everyone have to get cable or digital sattelite, or a buy a new television with a built-in digital tuner? I mean, this doesn't really affect me, since I have cable and have already made the move to HDTV (will these boxes receive HDTV channels and down-rez them to SDTV resolution, also?), but why should the current off-the-air TV viewers have to pay the costs of this change?


36 posted on 07/25/2006 1:34:45 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VRWCtaz; Peanut Gallery

I need a new laptop coupon since I get my news solely from the web!


43 posted on 07/25/2006 3:40:21 PM PDT by Professional Engineer (That's one small step...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson