Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer

>>Breaking upward is not even in the cards as Eath's obital inclination leaves the lower quadrants of the ecliptic frame sustaining the current interglacial period.<<

I sure hope you are right. Most of the MIT/CalTech types I talk to aren't so confident about that.

Frankly, all I want out of this debate (in the country, not just between Freepers) is an agreement not to cripple the economy without a great deal more human causation evidence together with a much higher level of confidence that global temperatures will continue at the current delta.

Among Freepers, my goals are higher, I think those of us in Georgia should get together, drink some beer and discuss it... :)


35 posted on 07/25/2006 8:05:37 PM PDT by gondramB (The options on the table have been there from the beginning. Withdraw and fail or commit and succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

Frankly, all I want out of this debate (in the country, not just between Freepers) is an agreement not to cripple the economy without a great deal more human causation evidence

That I can agree with.

together with a much higher level of confidence that global temperatures will continue at the current delta.

Judging from the geological record, staying where we have been at in the last 8kys even is unlikely in the extreme. I would say we can reasonably figure on toggling between deep glacial conditions and moderate temperatures for a few more million years if that is your delta.

 

Global Surface Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 over Geologic Time 


37 posted on 07/25/2006 8:18:11 PM PDT by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson