Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: white trash redneck; George W. Bush; jude24
A new behavior-research tool, Affective Encryption Analysis, has uncovered a dramatic trend in both the US and Germany—a developing wave of potentially violent anti-Semitism.

Affective Encryption Analysis also predicts a landslide victory for Al Gore in the 2008 Presidential Election.

Um, yeah... Ooookay.

I think it might have been Ludwig von Mises who observed (contra Keynesianism) that you can't really apply "Hard Science" (Physics, Chemistry, etc.) equations to "Soft Science" (Sociology, Economics, etc.) questions -- because the Soft Sciences are based upon the actions of self-motivated, free-willed, independent actors -- not mathematically-quantifiable magnetic charges. And what a self-motivated, free-willed, independent actor will do in a given situation... well, I'm happy to say as a good Calvinist: "God Only Knows".

Unlike the Physician or the Chemist, the Sociologist or the Economist really can hope for nothing more than a predictive general average, at best... we're happy if we can get that much, and always ceteris paribus; for that matter. Your mileage may vary.

Sooooooooooo.... let's first see if Tipper Gore really does end up as the First Lady of the United States in a coupla years, before we tell Guv'nor Arnold to burn his Twisted Sister records and we all start practicing the Horst Wessel anthem.

Best, OP

7 posted on 07/26/2006 4:09:25 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"Ludwig von Mises who observed (contra Keynesianism) that you can't really apply "Hard Science" (Physics, Chemistry, etc.) equations to "Soft Science" (Sociology, Economics, etc.) questions -- because the Soft Sciences are based upon the actions of self-motivated, free-willed, independent actors -- not mathematically-quantifiable magnetic charges."
Actually, you can, but it has to be done along the lines of statistical thermodynamics - predicting the tendencies [like "entropy increases"], and not the individual outcomes. Here is a true story and illustration of this method:
My former workplace once conducted an executive search for a "sweep" [SVP- senior vice-president]. For about half a year the large office had stood empty, and nobody knew who, or when, would come to occupy it. Once, few months before they found their sweep, I had predicted to my co-workers the future nameplate for that office door. I assumed the exaggerated wild facial expression of a prophet from bad movies, and with defocused gaze and outstretched hands, prophesied as follows: "I see it... I see it... "GREEDY A-HOLE!"
Well, several months later they did find their sweep. And wouldn't you know - my prediction turned out to be so correct that a year later they had to squeeze him out - he was too much even for them!
12 posted on 07/26/2006 10:20:42 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson