Skip to comments.
Senator Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Bust To Be Unveiled at the Museum of Sex
National Review ^
| July 26, 2006
| Kathryn Jean Lopez
Posted on 07/26/2006 10:26:09 AM PDT by dangus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-325 next last
To: dangus
"Artist Daniel Edwards describes this new sculpture as capturing Clinton 'with her head held high, a youthful spirit and a face matured by wisdom.'"
Ohhhh; is THAT what they now call facial wrinkles....? "a face matured by wisdom...."...? I think this has got to be one of the ugliest pieces of "art" I have ever seen...! No wonder "Slick Willie" strayed from the nest...
21
posted on
07/26/2006 10:34:03 AM PDT
by
Thunderchief F-105
(".....I never had sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.....!" yeah, sure......)
To: dangus
22
posted on
07/26/2006 10:34:09 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
To: dangus
Each paragraph more barf producing than the last. The author ended where he did because he carefully matched the word count with the alimentary volume of the average adult male.
Now I have to do a little home electroshock therapy to make me forget that I ever saw that statue. < shudder! >
23
posted on
07/26/2006 10:34:22 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Loose lips sink ships - and the New York Times really doesn't have a problem with sinking ships.)
To: dangus
Fascinating. Mr. Edwards managed to sculpt a bust of Hillary Clinton that's even uglier than the real thing. Kudos.
24
posted on
07/26/2006 10:34:35 AM PDT
by
RichInOC
(Hillary Clinton is a lying slag.)
To: dangus
She looks like a cross between Cindy Sheehan and the back end of a horse.
25
posted on
07/26/2006 10:35:17 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Glad to see the ink was still working in Bush's veto pen, now that he wisely used it on this bill)
To: RockinRight
> No Barf alert?<<
Isn't it implicit? What part of "Hillary Clinton," "Presidential", "Bust", "Unveiled" and "Museum of Sex" did you not comprehend???
26
posted on
07/26/2006 10:35:45 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: dangus
More like two small hen's eggs---FRIED!
27
posted on
07/26/2006 10:35:47 AM PDT
by
meandog
(If I were to draw the odious Islamic prophet Muhammad, he would have horns, a tail, and a pitchfork!)
To: dangus
Her display is titled "Untouched Wife"
To: Thunderchief F-105
>> I think this has got to be one of the ugliest pieces of "art" I have ever seen...! <<
So you agree it's a fantastic likeness?
29
posted on
07/26/2006 10:36:38 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: dangus
She looks like Jimmah Carter's long-lost alien brother.
BTW, you forgot to add "OVERWHELMING MEGA-BARFER" to your title.
30
posted on
07/26/2006 10:36:39 AM PDT
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
To: RockinRight
No Barf alert? Wasn't it implied in the words "Hillary Clinton’s ... Bust ... Sex"
Do you also need a "Do not pet the kitties!" sign at the tiger cage at the zoo?
31
posted on
07/26/2006 10:36:42 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Loose lips sink ships - and the New York Times really doesn't have a problem with sinking ships.)
To: dangus
I actually thought of General Palpatine in the Star Wars movies.
To: dangus
She doesn't have anywhere near that much neck.
[Wanna bet who 'commissioned' that bust?]
33
posted on
07/26/2006 10:37:26 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: dangus
The artist’s portrayal of Hillary Clinton as a president who also happens to be a sexual being conveys the message that a woman need not squelch her sexuality in order to succeed as leader of the free world.”ESPECIALLY if you are a Clinton of any sex...and any sex is the key phrase here... ESPECIALLY if you are a Clinton.
34
posted on
07/26/2006 10:37:35 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Mr. Silverback
If this doesn't deserve a "Caption This!" ping, I don't know what does.
35
posted on
07/26/2006 10:38:13 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: RichInOC
Fascinating. Mr. Edwards managed to sculpt a bust of Hillary Clinton that's even uglier than the real thing. Kudos. I've heard that a great scultor can get past the skin and expose the soul of his subject... which in Hillary's case is uglier than the skin.
36
posted on
07/26/2006 10:38:20 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Loose lips sink ships - and the New York Times really doesn't have a problem with sinking ships.)
To: dirtboy
...now, now......... let's not be so unfair to the back end of a horse..... in any cross between "Mother Sheehan" and a horse's hind quarters, the latter would only improve the looks of the former........!!
To: dangus
38
posted on
07/26/2006 10:38:49 AM PDT
by
npg
To: dangus
39
posted on
07/26/2006 10:39:19 AM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: dangus
Arrrrrrgh - cognitive disconnect - world going dim.....
40
posted on
07/26/2006 10:39:28 AM PDT
by
Hegemony Cricket
(Rugged individualists of the world, unite!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-325 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson