Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WWII documentary may incur indecency fines
Reuters ^ | 07-27-06 | WestVirginiaRebel

Posted on 07/26/2006 11:54:02 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel

LOS ANGELES (Reuters)-The U.S. government's crackdown on media indecency could prevent World War Two veterans from sharing their stories in an upcoming TV documentary series by Ken Burns, the head of the Public Broadcasting Service said on Wednesday.

Noted filmaker Burns' highly anticipated seven-part series "The War" features salty language used by servicemen and others. If the explecitives make it to air, they could lead to crippling fines for the offencing stations as a result of a new law signed last month by President George W. Bush.

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: censorship; fcc; fufcc; govwatch; kenburns; libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: lawdude

Laugh at me if you want to, but yesterday I was watching a program about raising goats on the RFD channel. I was amazed to hear a livestock expert from Texas A&M refer to "teets" on a female goat. When I was a kid, cows and goats had "t*ts" and that's what everybody called them. Was this another example of misdirected TV censorship or does the science of animal husbandry use different terminoligy these days?


41 posted on 07/27/2006 4:46:04 AM PDT by 19th LA Inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Wrong, there is not one bit of foul language that can not be replaced with decent language.

In many courtrooms, every lawyer that comes before that court knows that unnecessary profanity will not be tolerated. It is their responsibility to make their clients understand that.

Burns, as a professional film maker should know as well, if he chooses to ignore the law and include filth in his documentary, than let it lie on the cutting room floor, he has no one to blame but himself.

Burns knows the rules or at the very least he should. Go break the rules of your work place, see how long you are allowed to get away with it. Why should Burns be allowed to spit on the rules of common decency?

42 posted on 07/27/2006 4:47:58 AM PDT by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
I think the question should be posed to Ken Burns as to whether he wants our children to be able to watch this documentary

If I were Ken burns, I would show the documentary uncut and let the FCC look like monkeys for censoring the words of Gen. Patton. Your tax dollars at shirk once again.

43 posted on 07/27/2006 4:54:54 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 19th LA Inf
"Was this another example of misdirected TV censorship or does the science of animal husbandry use different terminoligy these days?"

I believe the word 'teets' is correct. Tits is a euphemism thereof.
44 posted on 07/27/2006 5:07:36 AM PDT by lawdude (To Colmes - It ain't rocket surgery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing

"Why should Burns be allowed to spit on the rules of common decency?"

Why should you be allowed to alter factual history?

If a soldier used the "F" word while being shelled, it would be disingenuous to change it.


45 posted on 07/27/2006 5:10:46 AM PDT by lawdude (To Colmes - It ain't rocket surgery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman

Most kids know all of those words by second grade. That's how it's always been. Only Brent Bozell thinks otherwise.


46 posted on 07/27/2006 5:13:57 AM PDT by Ace of Spades (Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
"The Law of Unintended Consequences at work again.

As if this congress gave a damn about unintended consequences unless the consequences can provide more political fluff.

I am about as disgusted with congress as I have ever been. Has congress done anything meaningful this year at all? Has congress accomplished anything this year except debate fluff political issues for November?

47 posted on 07/27/2006 5:18:52 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
"Or just have them use words like caca, doodoo and poopoo!"

I wouldn't be surprised to find those words prohibited. Congress probably thinks it can get 1 or 2 more votes in November if they go all the way in banning words.

48 posted on 07/27/2006 5:20:53 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Just bleep it out. My father was surrounded for six days by Chinese during the Korean War and he can still describe it without using profanity; ditto Jeremiah Denton speaking about his time in North Vietnam; ditto Joe Foss, CMO winner. If these guys can't do it without using the profanity, strike it up to class (or lack of it), bleep out the swearing and I doubt it will detract from the message.


49 posted on 07/27/2006 5:23:59 AM PDT by Jimnorwellwarren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 19th LA Inf

Referring to animals, the word has always been "teats" AFAIK, but regional pronunciation has varied between "teets" and "tihts".


50 posted on 07/27/2006 5:26:03 AM PDT by Eepsy (Hocus pocus alamagocus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jimnorwellwarren
I'm all for the bleeping,but, since they saved the world, I don't begrudge anyone from that generation their language.As a generation they had more "class" than mine-the boomers-could ever think of having.And, its reproven every day unfortunately.
51 posted on 07/27/2006 5:28:02 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

I'm more concerned about whatever spin Burns is going to put on this.


52 posted on 07/27/2006 5:30:04 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Crazier than a rattlesnake at a Thai wedding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost; freepatriot32
I'm sure bleeping some freaking words would ruin, just ruin the entire program.

Just as I am sure that the broadcast of a few four-letter words, in context, I might add, will mean the instant end of Western Civilization.

Don't we think the puffed-up busybodies in Washington have enough to do without spending our money on the profanity police?

"Mommy, Johnny said a bad word!"

53 posted on 07/27/2006 5:30:32 AM PDT by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ace of Spades
Most kids know all of those words by second grade.... A great reason to homeschool yur loved little ones.
54 posted on 07/27/2006 5:34:03 AM PDT by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
It's no different from laws preventing people from crapping on the sidewalk or exposing their privates to me. I could simply avert my eyes, but I'd prefer it if they could be arrested for doing so.

Thank you for what you are saying in your posts. You are expressing it well. As I have said before, I don't like to step in it and I don't like it crammed into my ears. That doesn't mean I pretend it does not exist.

55 posted on 07/27/2006 5:35:30 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jimnorwellwarren
My father was surrounded for six days by Chinese during the Korean War and he can still describe it without using profanity; ditto Jeremiah Denton speaking about his time in North Vietnam; ditto Joe Foss, CMO winner. Your point is excellent. And your examples top drawer, you are blessed to ahve such a dad.
56 posted on 07/27/2006 5:35:42 AM PDT by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Typical american... Reminds me of the 9/11 documentary where presenter Robert De Niro apologised for the foul language used by the fireman in one of the twin towers... Redicioulus!


57 posted on 07/27/2006 5:36:52 AM PDT by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimnorwellwarren

Joe Foss, CMH winner that is.


58 posted on 07/27/2006 5:37:38 AM PDT by Jimnorwellwarren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

I don't give a sh!t what they say as it couldn't come close to what was broadcast at the Slick Willie impeachment trial.

But seriously, what is the worst they could say? The "F" word? They say that all the time on tv after midnight on cable. And they pretty much drop the F bomb every other minute on HBO/Cinemax.

No, this is all an effort to blame Bush, the RIGHT, and most importantly, the evil Christian Right.


59 posted on 07/27/2006 5:40:41 AM PDT by subterfuge (Call me a Jingoist, I don't care...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

I'm not worried about their language, but if any of those old guys have a wardrobe malfunction they should be punished to the full extent of the law.


60 posted on 07/27/2006 5:46:37 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson