Skip to comments.
Newfound Blob is Biggest Thing in the Universe
Space.com ^
| 27 July 2006
| Ker Than
Posted on 07/30/2006 8:22:20 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: GreenHornet
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Beware of the Blob!
It creeps, and leaps, and glides and slides across the floor,
Right through the door, and all around the wall.
A splotch, a blotch, be careful of the Blob!
Burt Bacharach, 1958
To: HairOfTheDog
23
posted on
07/30/2006 8:39:32 AM PDT
by
HighWheeler
(Whenever a Kennedy is piloting a vehicle near water, someone is going to die.)
To: HairOfTheDog
Great pic. Ted is so drunk he's not even trying to negotiate the cones and yellow tape. He's just got his bloodshot eyes locked on his car in the parking lot. He probably dragged the cones and yellow tape clear to his beach house.
To: Flavius
A caller to the Art Bell Show last night stated that hydrogen is the smallest atom. This is not strictly true. In fact hydrogen is one of the largest. It is the one with least mass, however.
25
posted on
07/30/2006 8:52:08 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"Something this large and this dense would have been rare in the early universe,"
I think impossible would be the correct adjective. I've never understood how an explosion blowing everything away from its origin can cause some of the things being blown away to be blown together.
I've yet to see a Pizza Parlor be blown into existence by a suicide bomber!
To: Flavius
what kind of gasYa, leaded or unleaded??? Maybe it's got some potential...
27
posted on
07/30/2006 9:52:18 AM PDT
by
Iscool
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The universe designed for discovery.
Guillermo Gonzalez & Jay W Richards, The Privileged Planet
28
posted on
07/30/2006 9:56:10 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: RightWhale
In fact hydrogen is one of the largest. Really!! Weren't paying attention in chemistry class, were you?
29
posted on
07/30/2006 10:22:50 AM PDT
by
oldbill
To: oldbill
They didn't give you the real info in chem class.
30
posted on
07/30/2006 10:35:59 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: true_blue_texican
I've never understood how an explosion blowing everything away from its origin can cause some of the things being blown away to be blown together All this structure was merely quantum irregularity in the primordial blob, which was smaller than a single hydrogen atom to start with. Now these blobs are millions of light years across: hardly to be thought of as being blown together.
31
posted on
07/30/2006 10:39:53 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Looks like we don't do science very well anymore on FR.
32
posted on
07/30/2006 10:41:58 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
In fact hydrogen is one of the largest. [atoms] It has an atomic radius of 37pm. The only one smaller is He, with an atomic radius of 31pm, everything else is larger. Oxygen, for example, has a radius of 73pm. I don't know what you are using to determine that it is the largest.
33
posted on
07/30/2006 11:02:48 AM PDT
by
wyattearp
(Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
To: RightWhale
All this structure was merely quantum irregularity in the primordial blob,
There can be no "irregularities" if you start with a singularity. That is why I do not believe in the Big Bang. If the BB created space there could have been no "blob" prior to the BB. The expanding universe that the BB assumes is a singularity expanding into "creation". I infer that my body is expanding (and not just from my diet ;-) in a like manner. I'm not a "creationist". But I don't buy the BB either.
To: true_blue_texican
It wasn't a singularity. It weighed twenty pounds and was very small. It had quantum irregularities that inflation magnified a bazillion times in a small part of a second.
35
posted on
07/30/2006 12:12:45 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
Looks like we don't do science very well anymore on FR.No kidding. Any thread about astronomy now "must" (is it in the bylaws?) have the obligatory pics of Moore and Kennedy - just waiting for the Uranus joke.
36
posted on
07/30/2006 12:17:31 PM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: true_blue_texican
37
posted on
07/30/2006 12:20:28 PM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: Junior
Thanks for the ping my friend.
Intersting article, stupid thread.
38
posted on
07/30/2006 12:22:34 PM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: RadioAstronomer
They say that science education in the US has fallen to twelfth place or so in the world. I wouldn't doubt it. There were complaints even in England that they were closing physics departments in English public schools, but it is happening here, too. It's a symptom.
39
posted on
07/30/2006 12:24:09 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
Welcome to the world of feel good education, extreme whacko environmentalism, no kid left behind (dumb down education to the smallest denominator - I had personal experience with this one), teach only "fun stuff", science and math are too hard, and so on.
40
posted on
07/30/2006 12:34:33 PM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson