Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

Well both sides of the aisle agree on this one now...and I do agree that if the employer was duped, or whatever, that is one thing....but if they knowingly hired illegals, well they should be punished.....If employers don't hire, then there won't be incentive to come.....that is actually MORE important then the border.....as many experts have said


9 posted on 07/30/2006 9:27:04 PM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: NorCalRepub

I read somewhere that the largest employers of illegals are the homeowners.

Do you think you could ever find a gardner or a nanny/housekeeper, someone to clean up your backyard, work on your roof, etc., if you insisted to see the citizenship papers of everyone who does this kind of work for you?

As I said, the border should be secured, so they can't get in and they shouldn't get public assistance. Going agter the emplyers is just for show that they are doing something, it hurts businesses, but does nothing to solve the problem.


12 posted on 07/30/2006 9:31:09 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NorCalRepub
"If employers don't hire, then there won't be incentive to come.....that is actually MORE important then the border."

Yep, aka "the bottom line", "supply & demand". If the Feds had been on this all along, there would not be the border problem that there is.

66 posted on 07/31/2006 4:38:06 AM PDT by LZ_Bayonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson