Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bornacatholic
Your call. I suspect he doesn't want to repeat and make part of the apology those statements he characterized in the apology he released and he does not want to give them an even wider dissemination.

Anybody who feels offended by his statements (whatever they were and we don't know exactly what they were) has the right to refuse to accept the apology.
68 posted on 07/31/2006 2:27:05 PM PDT by Cheburashka (World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Cheburashka
I don't see how apologising to those he specifically slandered can be avoided if he is the traditionalist he imagines himself to be.

Tradition teaches slander is a grave offense which must be repented of and the record msut be set right. How one can do that absent specifically apologising to the Jews whom he singled out for slander is beyond me

70 posted on 07/31/2006 2:41:27 PM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson