[Lazamataz]

Yes, your way is cosmetically a bit better. However, my way is perhaps a little more honest, and has the added benefit of being a potential money-maker for the government.

I reject the erroneous presumption that the two have any resemblence to one another. My way is a simple denial of services. Your way involves proactive action.

[sitetest]

Dear Lazamataz,

"I reject the erroneous presumption that the two have any resemblence to one another. My way is a simple denial of services. Your way involves proactive action."

That's just hiding from reality.

If folks are permitted to aggress with complete legal impunity against a class of persons, many will commit acts of aggression. It is an invitation. In fact, it will become readily acceptable to work your own advantage against any person in this class.

On the other hand, my way, ironically, will likely REDUCE the incidence of aggression against this class of persons, because there will be some folks who don't want to pay for the permits.

AND, we still raise money for the Treasury.

It's the best of all possible worlds!! ;-)


sitetest