Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ark. governor: Day will come when cigarettes no longer sold
Associated Press (excerpt) ^ | August 2, 2006

Posted on 08/02/2006 2:28:12 PM PDT by HAL9000

Excerpt -

LITTLE ROCK - Gov. Mike Huckabee, who successfully pushed for a statewide workplace smoking ban earlier this year, predicted Wednesday that cigarettes eventually won't be sold because of their health risks.

"I think the day will come when we probably won't" sell cigarettes, Huckabee said on his monthly call-in radio show. "If cigarettes were introduced to the marketplace today, they wouldn't be sold. They'd never make it because what we didn't know when they were first created, sold and marketed is just how deadly harmful they were."

Huckabee was responding to a caller's question of why cigarettes are allowed to be sold if they are so harmful. The governor fielded complaints from at least two callers about the state smoking ban, which went into effect July 21.

~ snip ~


(Excerpt) Read more at pbcommercial.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: addiction; alcohol; cancer; cancerstick; chew; cigarettes; cigars; coffinnails; communistantis; denial; drugskilledbelushi; emphysema; govwatch; health; huckabee; huckananny; leroysstrawman; nannystate; nicotine; pipe; pufflist; shortnessofbreath; tobacco; tobaccoaddicts; warondrugs; wod; woddiecrushonleroy; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: MNJohnnie

What do you expect from a reformed Fatty??? HE has been on a campaign against Tobacco as well as food for the last few years.... getting more and more focused on it as he has lost weight (110 lbs).

I guess the revenue (taxes) that would be lost from the ending of tobacco sales would be made up with grants from the Feds for the NWOT (New War on Tobacco).


42 posted on 08/02/2006 3:37:10 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: BigTex5

I wish you would write a book. So many smokers claim that they cannot go the time it takes to eat a meal without a smoke.

To me - I think it is rude to smoke around other people who choose not to smoke (regardless of our point of view on the claimed health-related problems tied to second hand smoke). Just shows how much of a grip tobacco has on a person when they cannot go for a meal without smoking....


44 posted on 08/02/2006 3:39:06 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: weegee

Good thought!. The government is liable for taxing tobacco and not prohibiting its sale. The day will come when sick people will sue the government instead of the tobacco companies.


46 posted on 08/02/2006 3:45:54 PM PDT by angelanddevil2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

LOL.


47 posted on 08/02/2006 3:48:24 PM PDT by angelanddevil2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jumpstart1981

" It's nice not to have to go into a bar and come out smelling like an ashtray"

Nobody's ever prevented the establishment of bars with no smoking allowed.


48 posted on 08/02/2006 3:48:31 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jumpstart1981
Isn't it funny how people will cry foul when tobacco and nicotine is taken away but laud the government for telling people to go to jail for smoking marijuana?

exactly opposite in California - the best bud these days is gummint green from that farm in New orleans
49 posted on 08/02/2006 3:49:03 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar

Excellent, jung Herr.


50 posted on 08/02/2006 3:53:51 PM PDT by patton (LGOPs = head toward the noise, kill anyone not dressed like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Hmmmmmm and this is the same Huckabee some folks here were touting for president?? Not a conservative by any stretch! Conservatives to not buy into nanny state theories.
51 posted on 08/02/2006 4:01:30 PM PDT by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
He didn't really answer the question, did he.

Specifically, he did not explain why cigarettes continue to be sold. If they are that dangerous, it would justify banning their sale instantly. Of course, it would require more than merely opinion or anecdotal science or polls to prove scientifically that the danger is real.

To others, that is. Danger to oneself has never been nor should be prohibited by government.
The argument that the "state" ends up paying for poor choices by individuals is the most egregious legally imposed fraud in history. The most notorious red herring in ever. Nobody asked the state to do that. It was done specifically to manufacture the argument.

52 posted on 08/02/2006 4:02:54 PM PDT by Publius6961 (overwhelming force behaving underwhelmingly is a waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I think he's right. Things fade away. There aren't very many spitoons around any more and humans will eventually give up a pointless, death-dealing, expensive practice.

Things do change.

53 posted on 08/02/2006 4:05:03 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trampled by Lambs
Cigarettes are good for you ping!

No they're not.
But I personally choose them over this:

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences." -- C. S. Lewis

54 posted on 08/02/2006 4:08:51 PM PDT by Publius6961 (overwhelming force behaving underwhelmingly is a waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jumpstart1981
and could be legislated as well. I think that impairs the driver.

Let's not forget radios. Time spent changing stations, switching cd's, etc.

Instead, all vehicles could have a non stop loop of "the road to wellness, comrades" playing at all times the motor is running.

55 posted on 08/02/2006 4:11:33 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
To me - I think it is rude to smoke around other people who choose not to smoke (regardless of our point of view on the claimed health-related problems tied to second hand smoke). Just shows how much of a grip tobacco has on a person when they cannot go for a meal without smoking....

The other side of the coin: the moral busibodies go apoplectic if anyone suggests smoking only restaurants. They insist on going where they they can live their drama queen fantasies. Who's more insane?

56 posted on 08/02/2006 4:12:42 PM PDT by Publius6961 (overwhelming force behaving underwhelmingly is a waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All
"Isn't it funny how people will cry foul when tobacco and nicotine is taken away but laud the government for telling people to go to jail for smoking marijuana?"

Well let's see, while under the influence of marijuana, most people are of no use to anybody but themselves. While most smokers I know can carry on a intellegent coversation even with a cigarette hanging out of their mouth

BTW: Much of the anti-smoking movement is nothing more than spiteful reciprication by the pro-drug legalization crowd. Who, in reality, don't want tobacco banned, or smokers to quit They just want cigarettes to be put in the same category as "recreational" drugs. They believe that once this happens, smokers will have no choice but to either quit or become pro-drug legalization, swelling the ranks of the pro-drug movement.

57 posted on 08/02/2006 4:14:24 PM PDT by TruthBeforeAll (Christ gave and died. Mohammed took and killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Earth To Gov.Huckabee,Cigarettes Will Still Be Sold;The Government Will NO Longer Prosper As A Result!!!!!!!!!!!


58 posted on 08/02/2006 4:14:45 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

And Alcohol?


59 posted on 08/02/2006 4:15:31 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BigTex5
I've never met an angry stoner ;)

Stoner's are never angry because they are busy trying to find something to eat.

60 posted on 08/02/2006 4:16:12 PM PDT by Recon by Fire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson