Replies

On Thu, 24/9/09, r_v_karanth@yahoo.co.in wrote to Dr.Bhudia: You may be right. I had also given the explanation that tectonic activity could be a reason. However, there appears to be some human intervention. The tectonic fractures are somewhat oblique to these channels. Could this be a sort of sign to attract the attention from a distance? The ancient constructions above this hill are now destroyed. One arm of this structure (middle one) is also destroyed for taking out stone blocks. -RV Karanth Thu, 24/9/09, Dr Bhudia Kutch Science Foundation kutchsciencefoundation@hotmail.com wrote: From: Dr Bhudia Kutch Science Foundation Subject: RE: Lat-Long of "VI" hill To: "MS GADHVI" msgadhvi@rediffmail.com, "Viswanatha Karanth" r_v_karanth@yahoo.co.in, "drbhudia@yahoo.co.uk" drbhudia@yahoo.co.uk Date: Thursday, 24 September, 2009, 4:53 PM KHAVDA VI @ Paccham Raimalro Hill Dear Dr karanth saab, and MS GADHAVI Thank you for forwarding the Long Lati of "V I" Sign at the Place Raimalro Hill@ Khavda some calculative measurements and interpretation is attache, please correct if any errors. Yours dr Bhudia Do visit our ABOVE Clubs/Groups of Science Groups of India. "V I" Sign seen @ 23.857380 N 69.757579 E on the Paccham Raimalro Hill near khavda 3km as shown on the map. The sign Geo-trigonometric interpretation measured by satellite readings is as follows. All lines in the Sign has direction away from the North Pole and line AB 780' makes angle of about 30NE, where angle B is about 45 and line DE is not parallel to any other lines. Measurement line AB = 780 feet, line BC is 750 feet and AC is 600 feet apart, line DE is 730 feet Height A=335feet, B & E=215 feet, C=350 feet and D = 337feet from sea level Height difference B to A is 335-215=120 height of the hill at distance 780 feet of B to A. This makes inclination of height of the hill at B to A = sign Θ = 120/780 =0.15 where anti sign shows angle of 8.9 ONLY But we can not ignore a "Nenu Ni DHAR" civilisation near Khavada 1.5km @ 23.51N - 69.44E. Which make no relations to angle of Earth axis nor to direction to pole or pole star in the sky. Which makes me to think that it has not any geometric or astronomical relations but may be some tectonic marks of previous tectonic activity at the place? Dr.BHUDIA-Science Group Of INDIA. uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/venustransit_2004/ President:'Kutch Science Foundation'. Founder :'Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club - Bhuj - Kutch'. Life Member:'kutch Itihaas Parishad'. kutchscience@yahoo.co.in, kutchscience@hotmail.com, uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/ in.groups.yahoo.com/group/scienceclubofindia in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kutchscience in.groups.yahoo.com/group/kachchh in.groups.yahoo.com/group/bhuj Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:39:29 +0000 To: kutchsciencefoundation@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Lat-Long of "VI" hill From: msgadhvi@rediffmail.com CC: r_v_karanth@yahoo.co.in Dear Sir, Best wishes for your USA visit. Presently I have to work hard L. D. Engg. College to prepare lecture notes and PowerPoint presentations. Rest is fine. The VI hill is located at Lat: 23.857380 N Long: 69.757579 E Regards, Mahendra Dear Dr. Bhudia, Thanks for your mail and for sending scanned copy of toposheet of Khavda area. I can observe that the VI hill is named as Raimalro Hill on the toposheet you have attached with your mail and is located 3 km away from Khavda in NE direction. Regards, M. S. Gadhavi Dear Dr. Bhudia, Here is the lat-long of the hill sent by MSG: The VI hill is located at Lat: 23.857380 N Long: 69.757579 E -RV Karanth