1 posted on
08/05/2006 10:58:05 AM PDT by
pabianice
To: pabianice
I took the time to send an E-Mail to Brian pointing out that if Israel wanted to deliberately target civilians, the death toll would be in the tens of thousands, not the hundreds, because Lebanon has no air defense. I also pointed out that Mr. Abraham was a dolt.
2 posted on
08/05/2006 11:01:20 AM PDT by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: pabianice
"When Wilson asked this guy why he wasn't also condemning the Hezbollah savages, the spokestwerp replied that HRW was also unhappy with Hezbolla's rocketing Israeli civilians but that was understandable when considering Israel's actions... " I watched it also and I didn't hear the HRW guy say that it was "understandable when considering Israel's actions." He did focus only on Israel but I don't remember him excusing Hezbollah as you have stated.
3 posted on
08/05/2006 11:01:26 AM PDT by
avacado
To: pabianice
Any connection with reality is not in the vocabulary of HRW.
5 posted on
08/05/2006 11:08:47 AM PDT by
FreeRep
To: pabianice
Everyone does realize that hezbollah started this whole thing right?
7 posted on
08/05/2006 11:10:28 AM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(Native Texan)
To: pabianice
The HRW guy immediately launched into a high-pitched tirade against "Israeli aggression," I'd like to introduce you to my middle finger, Mr. HRW guy.
8 posted on
08/05/2006 11:13:41 AM PDT by
Finger Monkey
(H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
To: pabianice
Speaking from a perspective of Thailand's war against Islam (being poorly fought), HRW as well as Amnesty International are merely shills for Islam and (Ironically enough) the very Left that would be violently suppressed under Islam.
10 posted on
08/05/2006 11:14:56 AM PDT by
JimSEA
( "The purpose of diplomacy is to prolong a crisis." Spock)
To: pabianice
Gotta love the caption at the bottom of the screen: "IDF struck areas with no apparent military target."
1. Well, duh. Hezb'allah uses human shields. They hide in civilian areas specifically for the purpose of taking as many innocents with them as possible when Israel lobs an arty shell at one of their launchers.
2. Striking areas with no apparent military target is Hezb'allah's standard operating procedure. But I see that Human Rights Watch is nonetheless directing the bulk of its vitriol at Israel.
3. Remember how terrorists use unwilling human shields? They do that precisely so that useful idiots like Human Rights Watch will carry their propaganda water for them.
12 posted on
08/05/2006 11:17:46 AM PDT by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: pabianice
Reminds me of the description in the old testament, where the different tribes of Israel were at war with each other.
To: pabianice
HRW is looking to get today's top "Terrorist Water Carrier" award. If I knew how to do a photoshop...
To: pabianice
It's strange how two screen captures just seconds apart can look so different...
15 posted on
08/05/2006 11:33:58 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
To: pabianice
Human Rights Watch is an anti-American anti-Israel organization, and as far as I can remember it has always been so. It is far left and has the support of the Democrats and those that support Democrats. Question; why are people who know and understand what is happening in the Middle East still supporting left-wing Democrats?
16 posted on
08/05/2006 11:56:38 AM PDT by
YOUGOTIT
To: pabianice
HRW's Mr. Abrahams should be ashamed that he has gone against his own people....shame shame shame .....
To: pabianice
Human Rights Watch...where gay members of the Clinton administration go to redecorate.
23 posted on
08/05/2006 1:00:15 PM PDT by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: pabianice
Is it my prejudices or does this HRW guy look gay. You know that circular beard and mustache are as queer as a three dollar bill.
24 posted on
08/05/2006 1:02:15 PM PDT by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
To: pabianice
My Pastor isn't happy with the Israeli bombing around Beruit where a Lutheran supported hospital has come under fire.
I asked Pastor why the Israeli response has been documented but the primary action is lost/ignored.
As I remember it, Hamas kidnapped an Israeli teenager and murdered him. Then two Israeli soldiers were killed and more kidnapped.
Where's Hizbollahs dog in this hunt?
Of course if Jews are not human as Ahmedajam (sic-o) explains then maybe we should just turn our back on this "situation".
To: pabianice
When Wilson asked this guy why he wasn't also condemning the Hezbollah savages, the spokestwerp replied that HRW was also unhappy with Hezbolla's rocketing Israeli civilians but that was understandable when considering Israel's actions... No mention of the heinous war crime of Hiz launching attacks from amidst civilians.
This is what kills me about the left nowadays. They rail that the Geneva Conventions should apply to non-uniformed combatants. And then ignore the fact that the Geneva Conventions prohibit launching attacks from civilian locations. In other words, they are rank hypocrites.
26 posted on
08/05/2006 3:24:59 PM PDT by
dirtboy
(Why does Israel take border security seriously but we do not, when Islamists wish us both harm?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson