Watch how little coverage this gets, as compared with the Qana "massacre". . .
ok i heard 10 dead from that group.where did the other 4 come from?
Look for yourself:
http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ncl=http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/click/rss/1.0/-/2/hi/middle_east/5249972.stm
Oddly enough, there is not a single "angry" person, nobody quoted claiming it was an "atrocity"... WaPo says they were "reservists" - a term which covers pretty much every able-bodied Israeli Jew. No "outrage" to be found anywhere at all. Suddenly the treasonous Western press has rediscovered "just the facts, Ma'am".
and how it will be portrayed, as Israel getting a taste of their own medicine, as just revenge on the part of the long suffering hezbulli, and never a mention of words such as atrocity or war crime, words reserved only for Israeli actions.
So where's the al-Reuters photographer trying to get just the right shot of the dead civilians?
Maybe they could just photoshop some stock photos.
Where is Coffee Anan? I forgot: he only pontificates when Moslem terrorists are killed.