Sorry, that doesn't explain it in my mind. You're assuming that hajj is the one who photoshopped it. Why is the rest of Reuters' organization above suspicion?
Why is the rest of Reuters' organization above suspicion?
It isn't.
Why is Hajj beneath your suspicion?
445 posted on 08/06/2006 1:31:57 PM PDT by null and void
(Bipartisanship: when the Stupid Party & the Evil Party agree on something that is both stupid & evil)