[BadAndy]

"Neither lifeguards nor medical personnel are required to risk infection."

He was worried about infection from a 3 year old? So worried that he was willing to let him die? We are breeding a generation of cowards and apologists for cowards.

[A. Pole]

"Neither lifeguards nor medical personnel are required to risk infection."

He was worried about infection from a 3 year old? So worried that he was willing to let him die? We are breeding a generation of cowards and apologists for cowards.

3 year old get infections as easily as the grown ups. The age has sentimental impact, but saving the life of older person is as valuable.

But I agree, he was a coward unless he knew that someone else was willing to do it and then he was rather selfish.

[Leatherneck_MT]

"He was worried about infection from a 3 year old? So worried that he was willing to let him die? We are breeding a generation of cowards and apologists for cowards."

Amen

[catpuppy]

He was worried about infection from a 3 year old? So worried that he was willing to let him die? We are breeding a generation of cowards and apologists for cowards.

Exactly.

[ExpatGator]

Bingo! I am in total agreement.