Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
What can you say?

If there was someone else to help what is the problem? Neither lifeguard not a physician has the legal duty to endanger his own health.

Moral (not legal one) duty to take a risk would come into play if there was not other person willing to do it.

But there is an issue why the "mouthpiece." was not there?

7 posted on 08/07/2006 5:22:56 AM PDT by A. Pole (Prophet Ezekiel: "If he has exacted usury [...] He shall surely die; His blood shall be upon him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole
I>"But there is an issue why the "mouthpiece." was not there?"

Only one thing in the whole story is for certain:

An ambulance-chaser will sue the government (local, county, state, or federal, whichever can be named) for multi-millions of dollars, and the taxpayer will pay the bill....the lifeguard, of course, will not pay anything at all....except to live with the consequences of his (in)action.

11 posted on 08/07/2006 5:27:56 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson