Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan

Maybe the lifeguard had HIV and knew someone else was going to perform cpr.

He should however be fired for not performing his job or being incapable of performing his job.


8 posted on 08/07/2006 5:25:28 AM PDT by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero
Maybe the lifeguard had HIV

Or maybe he suspected the kid had HIV?

He should however be fired for not performing his job or being incapable of performing his job.

Exchanging body fluids is not required by the law. The question is why the mouthpiece was not there?

12 posted on 08/07/2006 5:29:07 AM PDT by A. Pole (Prophet Ezekiel: "If he has exacted usury [...] He shall surely die; His blood shall be upon him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero
Maybe the lifeguard had HIV and knew someone else was going to perform cpr.

I thought the very same thing. Granted, the chances of transmitting HIV through saliva are low compared with saving the life of a child. He could be slammed with anti-virals after the fact if the LG was forthright.

And yes, he should be subject to review and disciplined or fired for not having the requisite equipment to do his job. It's like a LEO going to work without his sidearm.

15 posted on 08/07/2006 5:31:55 AM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero
Maybe the lifeguard had HIV and knew someone else was going to perform cpr.

HIV can not be transmitted by mouth.

38 posted on 08/07/2006 5:59:47 AM PDT by Total Package (TOLEDO, OHIO THE BLUE PIMPLE IN A SEA OF RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson