And another - this one clearly is looking southwards (note to the right, you can see the ocean and no hills:
And, once again, for comparision, the litter photo:
So, then, where are the palm trees in the other northward-facing photo?
And another - this one clearly is looking southwards (note to the right, you can see the ocean and no hills:
And, once again, for comparision, the litter photo:
So, then, where are the palm trees in the other northward-facing photo?
Down the blvd...I can see them...they are in a straight line.
Which means this guy is a good 50 yards away from the bridge at this point - you can also see the small blue sign on the right-hand hillside in both pictures. But that makes something else very wrong. Look at the roadway to the right in the first picture - where would someone stand to be substantially lower than the litter and the photogs in the background? Nowhere. He's not being lifted up onto something - you can see the legs of the photographer in the striped shirt. So why on earth would someone in a litter end up in this position a long distance away from the road and not being lifted up into something?
This reeks of a superimposition of one image onto a background.
And I'll say one other thing - that guy SURE as heck does not look the least bit Lebanese. I've know a few in my life - that dude looks more African.
To me, since it appears that only his TOP HALF is still intact, and on the strecher, I'd consider THAT severly wounded....IMHO....since there is no "sag" or blood on the strecher for his bottom half, and I don't see HIM bleeding, nor his clothes, and NO DIRT on thr bloody part of the "strecher", etc,etc,etc,......
Notice in the center of the red circle, the material of the stretcher ENDS! The person who pointed out that it looks like the stretcher is a foot and a half long is 100% correct. The purple circle to the left is where the stretcher should appear from underneath his body, if he was actually lying on a stretcher.
