1 posted on
08/07/2006 10:38:35 AM PDT by
presidio9
To: presidio9
To: presidio9
Newt has always seemed best as a "behind the scenes" person to me, once he becomes the "party leader" he seems to screw it up.
3 posted on
08/07/2006 10:44:08 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: presidio9
Oh brother. As bad as some of the republicans are NONE of them come close to the pervert in chief, getting bjs in the oval office, selling secrets to the chicoms and pardoning terrorists.
NONE.
4 posted on
08/07/2006 10:47:42 AM PDT by
jackv
(just shakin' my head)
To: presidio9
5 posted on
08/07/2006 10:51:01 AM PDT by
Ciexyz
(Leaning on the everlasting arms.)
To: presidio9
Clinton Republican?
If I joined would it increase my chances of scoring chicks?
6 posted on
08/07/2006 10:51:52 AM PDT by
Fighting Irish
(Béagán agus a rá go maith)
To: presidio9
I have always been somewhat favorable disposed toward Newt......but I am always willing to change my opinions based on new facts. (One article is not enough, but is one more piece of a puzzle.)
7 posted on
08/07/2006 10:58:19 AM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some Freepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: presidio9
Thanks to amoral liberal converts from the Democratic Party, the Republicans are a party without any standards or morals.When you vote in a cartel for the many times you will not get the cream. All said with this corrupt "Two-Party Cartel" Newt is looking good. At least he can put together a statement & deliver it appropriately. I would vote for him for pres if he would put Tancredo as V/P in charge of ILLEGA immigration.
9 posted on
08/07/2006 11:23:46 AM PDT by
Digger
To: presidio9
Nothing much new here.
I don't know if I would go as far as to call Newt a Clinton Republican. I think that description would probably be more appropriately applied to McCain or Giuliani, both of whom have equally disreputable and public morality flaws in their past. Newt does, however, have a depressing tendency to fold under pressure and abandon principle in the face of expediency. That is notwithstanding some high-sounding rhetoric from him to the contrary, and is, in itself, enough to cause alarm at the prospect of a Gingrich Presidency.
The author does have a completely valid point, overall. The GOP certainly seems hell-bent on transforming themselves into a clone of the Democrats.
10 posted on
08/07/2006 11:45:07 AM PDT by
NCSteve
To: presidio9
They roll this out every few months before an election because of the legendary Reagan Democrats.
There are no Clinton Republicans, other than those PW rino men whose wives ordered them to vote for hitlary.
11 posted on
08/07/2006 11:48:26 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: presidio9
this makes a lot of sense, because there clearly was a huge internal shift against Newt in that period of time. I always wondered what happened, and this sheds some light on it.
13 posted on
08/07/2006 12:14:46 PM PDT by
ilgipper
To: presidio9
I hope this puts down the myth that Newt Gingrich was some spending hawk. The true spending hawks are never elected to leadership roles.
To: presidio9
Oxymoron = Bill Clinton Republicans
15 posted on
08/07/2006 4:23:36 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: presidio9
Blah blah blah...Republicans are going to Hell, Dims will take over. Cue the "We're doomed!" pic...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson