Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Justices uphold Night Stalker convictions, death sentence (If this was Texan, he'd be long gone)
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 8/7/06 | David Kravets - ap

Posted on 08/07/2006 2:01:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

The California Supreme Court upheld the convictions and death sentence Monday for serial killer Richard Ramirez whose so-called Night Stalker killing spree terrorized the Los Angeles area in the mid 1980s.

Ramirez, 46, was sentenced to death in 1989 for 13 Los Angeles-area murders in 1984 and 1985. Satanic symbols were left at murder scenes and some victims were forced to "swear to Satan" by the killer, who entered homes through unlocked windows and doors.

The justices unanimously denied claims that Ramirez was incompetent to stand trial, that the case should have been moved outside Los Angeles, and that all the killings should not have been handled at one trial.

The court also rejected an unusual claim that Ramirez should have been denied his choice of lawyers, who were hired by his family.

Defendants often argue they were not allowed to hire the attorneys they wanted, but Ramirez's appellate team said his choice led to an incompetent defense.

Both trial attorneys had a combined five years of experience and a history of being held in contempt. Each was absent for long periods during Ramirez's trial.

Despite warning Ramirez against retaining the two, the judge did not disqualify them.

"A defendant whose request to substitute counsel is granted cannot complain on appeal that the trial court should have denied the request," Justice Carlos Moreno wrote in the 106-page opinion.

The justices were not weighing the effectiveness of the attorneys, which is the subject of another appeal. The justices ruled that defendants generally have the right to choose lawyers of their choice.

The case is People v. Ramirez, S012941.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; convictions; deathsentence; justices; nightstalker; uphold
sentenced to death in 1989 for 13 Los Angeles-area murders in 1984 and 1985..

He's got a more few years to go, unfortunately

1 posted on 08/07/2006 2:01:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
(If this was Texan, he'd be long gone)

Not if he was a woman.

2 posted on 08/07/2006 2:02:53 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The "death sentence" in California means 15 years in the DEATH ROW HILTON courtesy of the California taxpayer. Texas has a much better approach.


3 posted on 08/07/2006 2:05:03 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Don't worry, his lawyers will find some liberal judge who will loophole him out of a death-sentence.


4 posted on 08/07/2006 2:06:08 PM PDT by The Blitherer (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why can't we have a torture penalty?


5 posted on 08/07/2006 2:08:20 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So when is he going to be relieved of the burden of existence???


6 posted on 08/07/2006 2:09:25 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

In September, a California Judge will finally get around to having a hearing and see if we can get the Death Penalty back on the rails here in California.

Justice is a joke these days where socialism is the standard of the day, imo.


7 posted on 08/07/2006 2:09:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

If we're lucky, in a couple years at best, we have a few others already in the stalled pipeline.


8 posted on 08/07/2006 2:16:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If it were Virginia he'd have been gone before that

"Rocket Docket" Baby!!


9 posted on 08/07/2006 2:21:05 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

"Why can't we have a torture penalty?"

I know how you feel. Ramirez made some of his victims listen to AC-DC at loud volumes.


10 posted on 08/07/2006 2:29:07 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Ramirez was sentenced to death in 1989" Well, why is he still alive and costing me tax dollars? This individual is clearly unfit to live in any society, even a prison society. The sooner he is put to death, the better we will all be.


11 posted on 08/07/2006 2:37:14 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
They should have let the citizens who caught him take care of him then rewarded them afterwords.

The BIL of Maxine Zazzara was at the time my small appliance repairman. He was the family member who had to go down and identify her body. He never worked another day after that because of the trauma he went through when he saw her. Ramirez not only mutilated, tortured and killed people, he ruined the lives of others too.

Richard Ramirez is a monster. I'll never forget the look on his face when he knew the camera was on him in the courtroom, it was the face of the devil.
12 posted on 08/07/2006 2:51:35 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (Spreading the truth - Doing the job the MSM won't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Why can't we have a torture penalty?

Ummm.... Maybe because the 8th amendment of US constitution specifically bans it?
13 posted on 08/07/2006 3:25:57 PM PDT by MirrorField (Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier
"Ramirez was sentenced to death in 1989" Well, why is he still alive and costing me tax dollars?

Clearly the Founding Fathers forgot to include speedy execution of the sentences when writing the 6th amendment...
14 posted on 08/07/2006 3:38:35 PM PDT by MirrorField (Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson