Lieberman foe would ally with Feingold

Capital Times ^ | Aug. 6, 2006 | John Nichols

[surrey]

I agree with you. I really don't think that Connecticut is that left-wing.

[cmsgop]

Thanks, I guess we will see soon enough won't we.....

[kellynla]

well I thought you might be interested...
I've gotten where I CANNOT STAND Alan Colmes so I quit watching the program.

[seasoned traditionalist]

"If Lamont wins on Tuesday, as seems increasingly likely, it will be a defeat for the Lieberman wing of the Democratic Party.

That's a very, very small wing.

Ya beat me to it. Great minds and all that rot lol.

I was going to posit that, just "who" (beside Joe himself) makes up the Lieberman wing of the Democratice Party.???

If it were a few years ago, I might suggest that there might be TWO--Lieberman and Zell Miller. However, perhaps I am overlooking ONE other DemonRat who openly supports W's War efforts?,

As an aside, this "editor" (John Nichols) is so obiviously a far-left, socialist, partisan, hack (and I have so informed him of same in an email) that he could have easily been writing for Pravda as an apoligist fool/tool in attempting to justify the actions/conduct of Putin or even Stalin--yes, this is not a pun or misnomer.

"Useful Idiots" such as Feingold, are the bane of democracies and the last (grasp) best hope for totalitarian, socialist, regimes such as Russia, Cuba, N. Korea and of course, Iran.

Can anyone now doubt who now controls the leadership of the Dims and how transparent their hatred for Bush has become that they would turn on someone who votes with them (and against W/Pubs) 90% of the time?

Is poor ol Joe considered a "DINO?"

Wish we had ONLY "ONE" RINO in our party--as opposed to at least, TEN, if not more.

Boy would be be "Golden."

[HawaiianGecko]

I'm tending to believe Lieberman will win tomorrow. I think Lamont is just exactly like Howard Dean two years ago. Dean had a huge lead going into election day in Iowa and then gets pounded into third place when real voters come out. I believe 70% of Iowa voted against him.

All that said, I wish Lamont would win by the skin of his teeth. It would put the Democrat party into an absolute snit. They'd all think moving left was the ticket for victory, but in the general election in '08 the GOP would eat their lunch.

 

[Enchante]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corliss_Lamont


Article mentions Lamont's late beloved socialist uncle, the late Corliss Lamont, who is the type of weenie who opposed even the first Gulf War because stopping Saddam from taking over the Gulf's oil supplies and becoming a regional superpower was irrelevant compared to being a far-left weenie who lives in a bubble world of utopian fantasies.

Ned Lamont may be just a small chip off this ol' block.....

[Democratshavenobrains]

Why would a Lamont win make any difference in the Red States? Democrats have already elected numerous officials just as moonbatty as Lamont, if not moreso.

[EagleUSA]

But I see no tendency on the part of pubbies to look for a fight. Nor the stomach to fight if they found one.
------
We have not seen a fighting Repub since Reagan. Washington for them has turned into a coutry club, where the order of the day is personal empowerment, getting re-elected and earning as much as they can in contribution from lobbyists. On occasion we see one stand up and fight for something, but it always fades away. Men like Curt Weldon, Pence, Allen, etc. -- where is the beef?? We have watched the birth of the RINO, an ugly beast that is a byproduct of the short-term selfish rewards of liberalism.

Washington has lost sight of the founding principles of this country, and the committment that those great men had to their country -- the breed is gone.

[Nuc1]

"Washington has lost sight of the founding principles of this country, and the committment that those great men had to their country -- the breed is gone."

There are many that your statement fits. And of course there are some very good folks in DC. There are also many patriots in our country but most of us are not in Washington and all of us have jobs. So we don't get a lot of attention. I think we will show up in November and shock the Dims. Your other points about RINOS and the country club are quite appropriate. Sigh, so much to do so few votes. Oh well, Carry On!! Let's give em hell. BTW the French at the UN just surrendered to the Lebanese...another Freeper said it ain't WWIII until the French surrender. I can't think of a weaker country to surrender too so we must be WWIII. ;)

[I_Like_Spam]

Got to agree that Lieberman will win.

The real Democrat rank-and-file doesn't have nearly as many peace-weinies and bush-obsessors as the activists and moneymen of the party do. Just like the real Iranian rank-and-file citizens aren't nearly as obsessed with global jihad and jew-hate as the ayatoilet leadership is..

And the national attention will bring out a bigger turnout than expected.

It would certainly be a plus for the GOP if Lamont were to win, but I don't think it is going to happen.

[HawaiianGecko]

72 percent reporting, Lamont leads by 6,300 votes, 51.6 to 48.4 percent (08/08/2006)

Well, it looks like I'm going to be proven wrong, but get my wish that Lamont wins by the skin of his teeth.