Posted on 08/09/2006 11:27:38 AM PDT by PercivalWalks
In Kai Mas recent AlterNet column The Difference Between a Womb and a Wallet (7/26/06) she applauds a U.S. District Court judges quick, contemptuous dismissal of Matt Dubays Roe v. Wade for Men lawsuit. Dubay sought to wipe out the child support payments he is obligated to make to an ex-girlfriend who, he says, used a fallacious claim of infertility to deceive him into getting her pregnant.
In opposing Choice for Men, Ma asserts that a woman's decision to terminate a pregnancy is not the equivalent of a man's choice to financially opt out of fatherhood. She cites the pain and discomfort of pregnancy, and the way motherhood may limit our mobility or careers. These problems are very real; however, so are the problems created when men are saddled with child support obligations.
According to Men's Health magazine, 100,000 men each year are jailed for alleged nonpayment of child support. Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement data reveal that 70% of those behind on payments earn poverty level wages. The Most Wanted Deadbeat Dad lists put out by most states are used both for police actions and to hunt and shame deadbeats through newspaper ads and publicity campaigns. These lists are largely comprised of uneducated African-American and Latino men with occupation descriptions like "laborer," "maintenance man" and "roofer."
Ma dismisses the burden of child support as being a few hundred dollars a month. However, in California, AlterNets home state, a noncustodial father of two earning a modest $3,800 a month in net income pays $1,300 a month in child support. The money--almost $300,000 over 18 years--is tax-free to the custodial mother. One can reasonably debate whether this sum is appropriate or excessive. One cannot reasonably dismiss it as being insignificant.
Ma portrays children as a mothers albatross, forgetting that parenting is also the greatest joy a person can experience in life. Yes, in single mother homes the mother bears the burden of most of the childrearing, but the mothers also experience the lions share of the joys and benefits of having children. Noncustodial fathers are not so fortunatetheyre usually permitted only a few days a month to spend with their kids. Once mom finds a new man, theyre often pushed out entirely in favor of the childs new dad.
Ma condemns men who lie, deceive, break their promises, or pull a 180 who agree to marry but don't, and laments that millions of women have been trapped into single motherhood for life with, often, next to no recourse. Yet according to a randomized study of 46,000 divorce cases published in the American Law and Economics Review, two‑thirds of all divorces involving couples with children are initiated by mothers, not fathers, and in only 6% of cases did the women claim to be divorcing cruel or abusive husbands.
The out-of-wedlock birth rate in the United States hovers around 33%--given the wide variety of contraceptive and reproductive choices women enjoy, this can hardly be blamed primarily on men. Yes, in some of these cases the mother and father shared a relationship which the mother (and the father) may have expected would become a marriage. Yet these relationships fail for many reasons besides male perfidy. These include: youth; economic pressure and the lack of living wage jobs (how many couples fight over money?); and the mothers post-partum depression and mood-swings. Its doubtful that many men really wake up in the morning and say to themselves my child loves me and needs me, my girlfriend loves me and needs meIm outta here.
Ma says men shouldn't be able to choose to abandon that child in the lurch. Yet 1.5 million American women legally walk away from motherhood every year through adoption, abortion or abandonment. In over 40 states mothers can completely opt out of motherhood by returning unwanted babies to the hospital shortly after birth. If men like Dubay are deadbeats and deserters, what are these women?
Whenever a child is born outside of the context of a loving, two-parent family, there are no good solutions. Ma overstates her case, but she is correct that Choice for Men is a flawed solution. However, the current regime, which provides women with a variety of choices and men with none, is also flawed.
Dubay's conduct is not particularly admirable, and he's certainly not a candidate for father of the year; however, he does have a point. Over the past four decades womens advocates have successfully made the case that it is wrong to force a pregnancy on an unwilling mother. Despite the backlash against Dubay, hopefully his lawsuit will result in a greater societal awareness that it is also wrong to force a pregnancy on an unwilling father.
This column first appeared in AlterNet (8/1/06).
Jeffery M. Leving is the Chairman of the Illinois Council on Responsible Fatherhood. He is the author of the book Fathers' Rights: Hard-hitting and Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute. His website is www.dadsrights.com.
Glenn Sacks' columns on men's and fathers' issues have appeared in dozens of America's largest newspapers. Glenn can be reached via his website at www.GlennSacks.com or via email at Glenn@GlennSacks.com.
Another case of supposed "Equal Rights" eventually becoming "Special Priviledge and Status". It happens EVERY time.
Think the Feminists will be marching for this guy?
bump
No, we need to "un-respect" a woman's "choice" to kill.
Abortion corrupts everything it touches.
If you don't want to pay, then don't play!
I must vehemently disagree with those who see this as an Abdication of Male Responsibility. What it is a Male demand for equal treatment under that Law. Women have the following choices with their Reproduction. Abortion (infanticide), Adoption, Leaving the child at a Fire Station, Keeping the baby and presenting the Father with an invoice. Men have the following options, become a Fugitive and go underground, Suicide, Prison if they don't pay for the invoice, voluntary sterilization.
What Many Conservative Women fail to notice. Minors who are used by predatory Women for sex. They are sexually abused get a Child Support bill when they reach age 18. So a Sexual Predator abuses them, then the Government rapes them for Child support from a criminal act perpetrated against them.
How about the New Mexico Policeman who paid child support for 5 years to his exwife for a child that did not exist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.