Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

DoD Announces Recruiting and Retention Numbers for July
1 posted on 08/10/2006 5:22:48 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
What's that you RATS??? Bring Back the Draft?? We can't maintain the numbers without the Draft???

Guess again you RATS!

2 posted on 08/10/2006 5:24:37 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Even if we go to war with Iran and suffer casualties in the thousands, we will still find enough young men to volunteer despite what the New York Times say.


4 posted on 08/10/2006 5:29:35 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

So what was all that yip-yip-yapping I heard around here not too long ago about the armed services not meeting their recruitment targets?


5 posted on 08/10/2006 5:32:11 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am a big fan of urban sprawl but I wish there were more sidewalks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
Waitaminute. If the services are meeting their recruitment goals, why are they also demanding involuntary extension of service? Just a few weeks ago, there was a story about a unit that was on it's way home; then, with 24 hours notice, they were told that they would not be deactivated, but would be sent back to Iraq. If the military has enough people, then why do things like that?

There's a conflict between:

(1) what the bureau of personnel DOES (keep people for involuntarily tour extensions)

And:

(2) what the DOD SAYS (recruitment goals are being met).

The most likely explanation for this conflict is that the DOD is being less than forthcoming. My best guess is that the recruitment "goals" are generated only after recruitment numbers (or good estimates thereof) are in, and that those "goals" are picked to make the actual recruitment numbers look good. If that's true, then the "fact" that recruitment goals are being met may not be a useful piece of data.
6 posted on 08/10/2006 5:39:38 PM PDT by Jubal Harshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Thanks to all who have served, all who are serving, and all who will serve in the future.

You are America's finest.


7 posted on 08/10/2006 5:40:12 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
"...the Marine Corps hit 112 percent"

Gung Ho!!

8 posted on 08/10/2006 5:53:03 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
(Listening for this in the MSM...)


9 posted on 08/10/2006 6:13:46 PM PDT by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

CNN is deeply disappointed.


11 posted on 08/10/2006 7:11:23 PM PDT by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson