Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut senatorial race now.....four-way
WNBC News ^ | August 10, 2006 | not specified

Posted on 08/10/2006 6:49:20 PM PDT by franksolich

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: nopardons
The GOP candidate may be an empty suit with some tarnish, but I wouldn't vote for LIEberman with a gun to my head.

I agree. Lieberman is as much a supporter of the Democrats' agenda of turning America into a French-style, secular-socialist welfare state as any other liberal Democrat, but Lamont is complete laughing stock. I don't know where the rats found that kid, but talk about a deer in the headlights - - whew! I would prefer Lieberman to that mouse Lamont if only to spank MoveOn and the rest of the goofball left.


61 posted on 08/10/2006 9:04:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: franksolich
I'm never sure why some object to "too many" ping lists; I'm on lots and lots of them,

Things sometimes scroll so fast, I lose "conversations". On the bright side, even if all of my posts are ignored, it still feels like "someone" around here is willing to talk to me. lol

62 posted on 08/10/2006 9:10:52 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

lol


63 posted on 08/10/2006 9:19:09 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

64 posted on 08/10/2006 10:06:44 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

Saw in another article yesterday, the Dems are not targeting the Connecticut race for cash support because Lamont has his own money, and either way (Lamont/Lieberman) they figure it's a win-win situation for them.

I also read elsewhere where Lieberman plans to caucus with the Dems after the election. No surprise there.


65 posted on 08/11/2006 4:37:20 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Saw in another article yesterday, the Dems are not targeting the Connecticut race for cash support because Lamont has his own money, and either way (Lamont/Lieberman) they figure it's a win-win situation for them.

Right; not all Democrats are DUmmies, and we need to keep remembering that, as the elections get closer.

Since this is a win-win situation for the Democrats (not the DUmmies) anyway, it's a better "investment" to put money where another Democrat stands a chance of unseating a Republican.....and besides, the J.P. Morgan heir has his own, circa $200 million.

I have never understood this Democratic--and DUmmie--infatuation with the extremely wealthy.

66 posted on 08/11/2006 4:49:22 AM PDT by franksolich (the bell tolls for thee, the bell tolls for Fat Che)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

I'm not sure (as far as Democrats are concerned) it's a facination with wealth as much as it is with wealthy leftists. They know where their bread is buttered. And it provides those wealthy leftists (aka. the Kennedys, the FDR clan, the Dodds, Kerry's wife, et al) an opportunity to shape government.


67 posted on 08/11/2006 5:12:53 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

"either way (Lamont/Lieberman) they figure it's a win-win situation for them"

The Democrats assume far too much here.

Joe Lieberman has always been strong-willed and independent.
And loyal.
The Democrats were just disloyal to him.
Joe is going to run as an independent, pitching to the REST of Connecticut.
There is no particular reason to believe that, if he is elected, Joe will throw over his new friends in favor of his old ones. He has never been known to do that. He might caucus with the Democrats, but he'll be more independent than ever, because he doesn't NEED their party if he is elected with as big a margin as he will probably get.


68 posted on 08/11/2006 5:47:22 AM PDT by Vicomte13 (The Crown is amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: franksolich
Moe, Larry, Curly and now Shemp!

Hmmm?

Rather degrading to the Stooges.

Let's make it....um...Another turd jumps into the punch bowl?

69 posted on 08/11/2006 5:52:06 AM PDT by N. Theknow ((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

That could well be true, even likely. Time will tell. The fact is, however, that the Dems are now forced to back a candidate that likely won't win in place of one who's been on their ticket through three elections, and even was their Vice Presidential candidate 6 years ago.

This is where their growing association with the DUmmies has taken them. I can't believe everyone in that party has their blinders on and hasn't realized this. It doesn't bode well for Democratic incumbents unless they toe the line.


70 posted on 08/11/2006 6:02:19 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13; bcsco
There is no particular reason to believe that, if he is elected, Joe will throw over his new friends in favor of his old ones. He has never been known to do that. He might caucus with the Democrats, but he'll be more independent than ever, because he doesn't NEED their party if he is elected with as big a margin as he will probably get.

Exactly.

There is no doubt Joseph Lieberman is a loyal Democrat--he voted the Democratic party-line 90+% of the time, a higher percentage than most DUmmie icons.

But being compelled to run as an independent shifts the thoughts, even among the most loyal.

It is reasonable to suspect that after January 3, 2007, Joseph Lieberman while still adhering for the most part to the Democratic party-line, is going to loosen up a bit, voting that party-line perhaps only 75% or 80% of the time.

The DUmmies had a loyal Democrat, but tossed him overboard because of their infatuation with a wealthy scion of Wall Street who, as it now appears, has not a snowball's chance in the Lower Place, of winning.

71 posted on 08/11/2006 6:07:24 AM PDT by franksolich (the bell tolls for thee, the bell tolls for Fat Che)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

HAH! Yet another opportunity for the DUmmies to get mad at the Greens in their midst. Let the fun begin!


72 posted on 08/11/2006 6:20:01 AM PDT by Purrcival (" A mouse can't fart in Zaire, without Rove having a hand in it." - FReeper dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
HAH! Yet another opportunity for the DUmmies to get mad at the Greens in their midst. Let the fun begin!

This is still not on the DUmmie radar, though.

Apparently arrogance is a factor here; the DUmmies appear to believe that the J. P. Morgan heir will inevitably win no matter what, and so this latest entry doesn't make any difference.

It's not good for the future of the republic that there's so many voluntarily ignorant among us, but oh well; November should be fun.

73 posted on 08/11/2006 6:23:42 AM PDT by franksolich (the bell tolls for thee, the bell tolls for Fat Che)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

This is unreal. Am I seeing things, or is it possible that the DUmmies STILL haven't picked up on this choice bit of news?


74 posted on 08/11/2006 6:37:01 AM PDT by Purrcival (" A mouse can't fart in Zaire, without Rove having a hand in it." - FReeper dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

I will enjoy seeing Lamont lose.

It'll be the biggest joke on the democrats.

Hopefully they never catch on that they need to shake themselves loose of the moon bats.


75 posted on 08/11/2006 6:39:26 AM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franksolich
They're too focused on the plot between Blair/Bush/Rove/OBL to take the attention away from the Connecticut primary. What they haven't yet realized is that this now opens up Bush/Chaney to another accusation; that they engineered the Green Party decision.
76 posted on 08/11/2006 6:41:06 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

how about write in for ann?


77 posted on 08/11/2006 10:41:55 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson