Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000

Not worth the bytes it takes to store it.

UNIFIL is a non-starter, as is the Lebanese Army. Might as well just invite Hezbullies back in on a red carpet, after the UN troops clean up the place of course.

I say send NATO, but only at the speed of Iranian and Syrian sanctions.


2 posted on 08/11/2006 2:25:14 PM PDT by wvobiwan (BOYCOTT NYT, LAT, AP, Reuters, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, BBC, WaPo, Haaretz, and ALL leftist rags!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wvobiwan

Why send NATO? This resolution is more worthless than Bubba Clinton's pledges of marital fidelity. The Islamofascists will break any agreement even before the ink is dry. And since the IDF has gotten the green light for the massive ground operation, no time lost as the IDF continues its mission.


13 posted on 08/11/2006 2:47:25 PM PDT by medscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wvobiwan
I say send NATO, but only at the speed of Iranian and Syrian sanctions.

The only peacekeeping force that would work, is a force able AND WILLING to fire upon any Hezbollah units that tried to set up rockets in South Lebanon

Anybody think such a force would be acceptable to the Muslim side? Anybody think such a force would not be subjected to unending IED attacks?

18 posted on 08/11/2006 3:17:53 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson