Posted on 08/11/2006 6:36:18 PM PDT by SandRat
KABUL, Afghanistan, Aug. 11, 2006 – Foreign observers of the U.S. military often say what puts it above other militaries is the quality of the noncommissioned officer corps. Many other nations want the same for themselves.
The Afghan National Army is learning from Western military trainers who stress the central role of NCOs in a world-class military. Afghan army Chief of Staff Gen. Bismullah Khan stressed the role of NCOs in the new military by recently appointing the nation's first sergeant major of the army, Roshan Safi.
Senior American NCOs say the appointment is crucial to developing an NCO corps in the country. "It's huge," said Army Command Sgt. Maj. William J. Gainey, senior enlisted advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "The appointment sends a message to the officers of the Afghan National Army that officials at the very top of the military consider this important."
Gainey visited the country with the chairman, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, from July 26-29.
The senior enlisted adviser to Combined Forces Command Afghanistan, Army Command Sgt. Maj. Daniel R. Wood, said Safi's appointment came as an eye-opener for many officers in the Afghan National Army. "Typically, NCOs didn't get a lot of respect under the old regime," Wood said.
He noted that the former Afghan army followed the Soviet style of management: officers made all decisions and discouraged individual initiative. "Lieutenants and captains made all the decisions at the unit level, and they had captains or majors doing what we would consider NCO work at higher levels," Wood said.
Safi graduated from the U.S. Army's Sergeant Major Academy, at Fort Bliss, Texas, and came back to the Afghanistan with a thorough knowledge of how the American NCO corps functions. "He identifies problems, solves the ones he can, and suggests solutions for those above his pay grade," Wood said.
"He is an asset to his commander and a role model to his soldiers," Gainey said.
Still, the Afghan National Army’s NCO corps is likely to have growing pains. Wood said many officers remain reluctant to accept an expanded role for NCOs, and cultural and societal problems must be overcome. "Many of the soldiers in the ANA are illiterate," he said. “They are good soldiers, but have never been to school. This places a barrier in the way of many who would otherwise make fine NCOs.”
The U.S. military serves as a model for other countries seeking to build more effective NCO corps. "These countries see us, they see the British and Germans and other western nations, and they like the capabilities NCOs bring to their military," Gainey said. "They want to learn from the best."
NCO's are the true backbone of any Army - a new concept for them.
Officers command, NCOs run the Army.
Any good Officer knows to brief his NCOs on the object of the mission then allow them to accomplish said mission. "Tell me what you want done Sir, don't tell me how to do it."
"Officers command, NCOs run the Army."
And Spec 4s do everything else (and there is plenty left to do).
If this interests you read Kaplan, Imperial Grunts. He talks about this issue in our work with other armies round the world. Interesting.
I'm glad you mentioned the book, I've heard the author in interviews and definitely want to read the book.
That is one hell of a true statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.