Skip to comments.
US involved in planning Israel operations -- The New Yorker (Seymour Hersh)
Agence France-Presse (excerpt) ^
| August 13, 2006
Posted on 08/13/2006 1:20:34 AM PDT by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: IrishRainy
By all appearances, he's a damned liberal, and liberals don't care one whit about this country.
41
posted on
08/13/2006 3:54:53 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
:)
42
posted on
08/13/2006 3:55:19 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" only 10% are radical, that's 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: HAL9000
"Citing an unnamed Middle East expert with knowledge of the current thinking of the Israeli and US governments
"
43
posted on
08/13/2006 3:55:22 AM PDT
by
elfman2
(An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
To: Nathan Zachary
Of course, the unamed "expert", who else? Prolly just some leftwing lunatic from DUOr one of the voices in his head.
44
posted on
08/13/2006 3:56:14 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: HAL9000
Hey, I've got a story for him. It looks like both Hezbollah and the Iraqi insurgents are bogged down in their fight against Israel and the Iraqi and US forces. It's a real quagmire for them. They don't seem to have any exit strategy. Their losses mount day by day. We haven't been allowed to see the funerals of the Hezbollah fighters, yadayadayada.
To: Fitzcarraldo
thanks for posting that pic - but is it just me or does it look like light beams are shooting out of his a$$ as he stands at that podium?
You can guess what I think comes out of his mouth...
46
posted on
08/13/2006 4:01:23 AM PDT
by
Dinah Lord
(fighting the Islamic Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
To: HAL9000
Even if I didn't already know the reputation of this man, anyone who wins the Pulititzer Prize is suspect. That prize is simply a mechanism for liberal-left journalists to pat each other on the back.
The New Yorker is similarly completely partisan. Recall that they ran an article a few years ago attempting to exonerate the Rosenbergs. They never ran a retraction when the Venona files and other evidence from Soviet records became avialble, showing conclusively that the Rosenbergs were guilty. All through the Vietnam War, The New Yorker ran stories attacking US soldiers for atrocities, most of which were reported from biassed sources, or were fabricated.
47
posted on
08/13/2006 4:05:46 AM PDT
by
docbnj
To: HAL9000
Hope it's true!
And Hersch can go fly a kite, he's a hatemongering troublemaker.
48
posted on
08/13/2006 4:35:33 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Kakaze
"There is no way that (Defense Secretary Donald) Rumsfeld and Cheney will draw the right conclusion about this," ""I'm pretty sure you don't have the war plan" - Rummy.
49
posted on
08/13/2006 5:19:24 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: D-fendr
Absurd. What, exactly, do the Israelis need from the US regarding Lebanon ?
To: HAL9000
Hey Sy, how did that Iran invasion we did a year ago working out?
To: Fitzcarraldo
In 2006 he reported on the US military's plans for Iran, which called for the use of nuclear weapons against that country. Well that is completely dishonest spin. He claimed Bush was planning a nuclear strike against Iran. He did not claim it was a military contingency plan. He said Bush WAS going to nuke Iran.
52
posted on
08/13/2006 5:57:15 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(History shows us that if you are not willing to fight, you better be prepared to die)
To: LeoWindhorse
No, that was Adam Clymer of the NY Slimes.
But Sy Hersh is also a "Major League A__hole - Big Time".
53
posted on
08/13/2006 6:00:42 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
To: nathanbedford
Hersh is pathetic. He wishes to sabotage US power. But I hope he is right. The president, however, must make the case for an invasion of Iran. Air attacks alone cannot be relied upon. It must be assumed that when Iran has nuclear weapons, it will use them. It is no different from letting Osama have nukes.
To: HAL9000
USAF will advise as needed,thak you.
Comment #56 Removed by Moderator
To: HAL9000
This is an opinion piece dressed up as a news item.
57
posted on
08/13/2006 8:53:08 AM PDT
by
Excellence
(Vote Dhimmocrat; you'll look good in a burqa!)
To: D-fendr
Whether this is true or false, Seymour has gone over to the dark side...Uh, yeah, like 30 years ago.
58
posted on
08/13/2006 8:54:46 AM PDT
by
veronica
(New Literary and Arts Journal Offers FREE ADVERTISING! - FReepmail me for info...)
To: HAL9000
Hersh is a self-hating Jew and a terror apologist.
59
posted on
08/13/2006 10:23:33 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: piasa
Thanks! I wonder who this is:
Citing an unnamed Middle East expert with knowledge of the current thinking of the Israeli and US governments. . .
60
posted on
08/13/2006 2:29:29 PM PDT
by
Fedora
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson